Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $44M | $11.14B | $26.21B | $155.02B | $79.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $27M | $1.13B | $6.00B | $28.52B | $18.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $187M | $906M | $3.99B | $2.44B |
| Gross Margin | 16.0% | 30.1% | 35.5% | 36.9% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | -35.4% | 19.8% | 20.8% | 18.1% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 56.4x | 24.9x | 30.1x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $775K | $2M | $2.61B | $11.17B | $13.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $451M | $483M | $622M | $1.54B |
PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pioneer Power Solut… (PPSI) | 100 | 441.1 | +341.1% |
| Powell Industries, … (POWL) | 100 | 3488.0 | +3388.0% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.4 | +302.4% |
| Eaton Corporation p… (ETN) | 100 | 472.9 | +372.9% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PPSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 105.8%, EPS growth 16.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.7%
- 105.8% revenue growth vs EMR's 3.0%
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 30.1x)
- 118.4% margin vs EMR's 13.3%
POWL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs ETN's 6.1%
- PEG 0.94 vs EMR's 4.80
- +425.5% vs EMR's +30.4%
HUBB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.38, Low D/E 67.6%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.38, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.72x
- Beta 1.38 vs PPSI's 2.00
Among these 5 stocks, ETN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.5%
- 1.5% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs HUBB's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 105.8% revenue growth vs EMR's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 30.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 118.4% margin vs EMR's 13.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.38 vs PPSI's 2.00 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs HUBB's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +425.5% vs EMR's +30.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 85.9% ROA vs EMR's 5.8%, ROIC -122.4% vs 8.2% |
PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
POWL leads 2 • PPSI leads 0 • HUBB leads 0 • ETN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETN is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.5B annually — 1046.4x PPSI's $27M. PPSI is the more profitable business, keeping 118.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EMR's 13.3%. On growth, ETN holds the edge at +16.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $27M | $1.1B | $6.0B | $28.5B | $18.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $232M | $1.5B | $5.9B | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $187M | $906M | $4.0B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $143M | $909M | $4.7B | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +30.1% | +35.5% | +36.9% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -35.4% | +19.8% | +20.8% | +18.1% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +118.4% | +16.5% | +15.1% | +14.0% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.3% | +12.6% | +15.2% | +16.5% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.9% | +6.5% | +11.1% | +16.8% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | -0.8% | +8.3% | -9.4% | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PPSI and EMR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.4x trailing earnings, PPSI trades at a 98% valuation discount to POWL's 61.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), POWL offers better value at 1.03x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $44M | $11.1B | $26.2B | $155.0B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $10.7B | $28.3B | $165.6B | $91.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.37x | 61.76x | 29.81x | 38.17x | 34.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.41x | 24.95x | 30.11x | 21.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.03x | 1.43x | 1.55x | 7.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 47.51x | 20.81x | 27.69x | 18.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.92x | 10.09x | 4.48x | 5.65x | 4.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 17.43x | 6.85x | 7.99x | 3.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 72.00x | 29.97x | 34.67x | 29.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PPSI delivers a 105.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $105 in annual profit, vs $12 for EMR. POWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EMR's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs POWL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +105.1% | +28.6% | +24.4% | +20.8% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +85.9% | +16.9% | +11.6% | +9.0% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -122.4% | +90.6% | +17.1% | +13.6% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.7% | +37.5% | +20.1% | +16.8% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.00x | 0.68x | 0.57x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | -$449M | $2.1B | $10.5B | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $451M | $483M | $622M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $775,000 | $2M | $2.6B | $11.2B | $13.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 16.90x | 16.38x | 6.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWL five years ago would be worth $252,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,801 for PPSI. Over the past 12 months, POWL leads with a +425.5% total return vs EMR's +30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors POWL at 161.5% vs PPSI's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.6% | +160.4% | +6.8% | +22.3% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +62.3% | +425.5% | +41.5% | +33.2% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.7% | +1689.0% | +87.9% | +141.3% | +75.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.0% | +2428.2% | +159.4% | +182.8% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.9% | +2652.9% | +410.7% | +608.7% | +206.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.3% | +161.5% | +23.4% | +34.1% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUBB and ETN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HUBB is the less volatile stock with a 1.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PPSI's 2.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETN currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs PPSI's 69.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 2.08x | 1.32x | 1.45x | 1.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.70 | $434.00 | $565.50 | $435.43 | $165.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.31 | $54.75 | $349.40 | $296.93 | $108.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.5% | +70.5% | +87.2% | +91.7% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 83.2 | 41.2 | 59.8 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 691K | 546K | 2.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
EMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: POWL as "Hold", HUBB as "Hold", ETN as "Buy", EMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.3% upside for EMR (target: $161) vs -22.3% for POWL (target: $238). For income investors, EMR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs POWL's 0.12%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $237.67 | $545.43 | $397.50 | $161.31 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 17 | 39 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +1.1% | +1.0% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 12 | 24 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.35 | $5.35 | $4.17 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.9% | +1.2% | +1.6% |
EMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). POWL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
PPSI vs POWL vs HUBB vs ETN vs EMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc.
(PPSI) is the stronger pick with 105. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. (PPSI) offers the better valuation at 1. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR?
On trailing P/E, Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc.
(PPSI) is the cheapest at 1. 4x versus Powell Industries, Inc. at 61. 8x. On forward P/E, Emerson Electric Co. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Powell Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR?
Over the past 5 years, Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) delivered a total return of +24. 3%, compared to +48. 0% for Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. (PPSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWL returned +26. 8% versus PPSI's +26. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
32β versus Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. 's 2. 09β — meaning PPSI is approximately 59% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 68% for Emerson Electric Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc.
(PPSI) is pulling ahead at 105. 8% versus 3. 0% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 1626% year-over-year, compared to 10. 1% for Eaton Corporation plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, POWL leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR?
Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc.
(PPSI) is the more profitable company, earning 139. 2% net margin versus 12. 7% for Emerson Electric Co. — meaning it keeps 139. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus -22. 9% for PPSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 56. 4x for Powell Industries, Inc. — 34. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 3% to $161. 31.
08Which pays a better dividend — PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR?
In this comparison, EMR (1.
5% yield), HUBB (1. 1% yield), ETN (1. 0% yield), POWL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PPSI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PPSI or POWL or HUBB or ETN or EMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
0% yield, +614. 3% 10Y return). Pioneer Power Solutions, Inc. (PPSI) carries a higher beta of 2. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ETN: +614. 3%, PPSI: +26. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PPSI and POWL and HUBB and ETN and EMR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PPSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; POWL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ETN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. HUBB, ETN, EMR pay a dividend while PPSI, POWL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.