Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Permian Resources Corporation (PR) vs Matador Resources Company (MTDR) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MTDR | 6.2% revenue growth vs PR's -100.0% |
| Value | MTDR | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 16.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | PR | 24.0% net margin vs MTDR's 20.5% |
| Stability / Safety | PR | Beta 1.34 vs MTDR's 1.40, lower leverage |
| Dividends | PR | 3.3% yield, vs MTDR's 2.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PR | +34.1% vs MTDR's +1.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MTDR | 7.3% ROA vs PR's 5.2%, ROIC 11.8% vs 8.5% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Permian Resources is an independent oil and gas company focused on developing crude oil and liquids-rich natural gas reserves in the Delaware Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. It generates revenue primarily from oil sales (roughly 70% of total revenue), with natural gas and natural gas liquids making up the remainder. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated, high-quality acreage position in the core of the Delaware Basin — one of the most productive and cost-competitive oil regions in the United States.
Matador Resources is an independent oil and gas exploration and production company focused on shale plays in the Delaware Basin and other U.S. regions. It generates revenue primarily from oil sales (~60% of total revenue) and natural gas sales (~40%), supplemented by midstream services for third parties. The company's competitive advantage lies in its concentrated, high-quality acreage position in the prolific Delaware Basin — particularly in the Wolfcamp and Bone Spring formations — which provides low-cost, high-return drilling opportunities.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
PR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). MTDR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
PR and MTDR operate at a comparable scale, with $3.9B and $3.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 24.0% (PR) to 20.5% (MTDR). On growth, MTDR holds the edge at -13.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | MTDRMatador Resources… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.9B | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.5B | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $935M | $759M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.6B | $830M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.2% | +88.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.5% | +33.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.0% | +20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +92.6% | +22.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -13.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +55.2% | -9.4% |
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, MTDR trades at a 41% valuation discount to PR's 14.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PR's 0.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTDR's 3.5x.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | MTDRMatador Resources… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $6.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $8.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.29x | 8.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.35x | 11.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.44x | 3.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.43x | 2.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MTDR delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for PR. PR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTDR's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTDR scores 5/9 vs PR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | MTDRMatador Resources… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.5% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.2% | +12.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $154M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $135M | $2.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.62x | 5.96x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth $49,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $24,960 for MTDR. Over the past 12 months, PR leads with a +34.1% total return vs MTDR's +1.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PR at 22.5% vs MTDR's 0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | MTDRMatador Resources… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +34.1% | +1.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +83.8% | +1.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +390.6% | +149.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +240.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.5% | +0.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PR is the less volatile stock with a 1.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MTDR's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | MTDRMatador Resources… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.34x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.58 | $53.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.01 | $35.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.4% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 58.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PR as "Buy" and MTDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.3% upside for MTDR (target: $57) vs 4.6% for PR (target: $19). For income investors, PR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.35% vs MTDR's 2.55%.
| Metric | PRPermian Resources… | MTDRMatador Resources… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.13 | $56.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.3% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.61 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 100 | 725.35 | +625.3% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 433.66 | +333.7% |
Permian Resources C… (PR) returned +391% over 5 years vs Matador Resources C… (MTDR)'s +150%. A $10,000 investment in PR 5 years ago would be worth $49,064 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | $99M | $0.00 | -100.0% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | $264M | $3.7B | +1297.9% |
Permian Resources Corporation's revenue grew from $99M (2016) to $0M (2025) — a -100.0% CAGR. Matador Resources Company's revenue grew from $264M (2016) to $3.7B (2025) — a 34.1% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | -2.3% | 19.7% | +958.1% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | -36.8% | 20.5% | +155.8% |
Matador Resources Company's net margin went from -37% (2016) to 21% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | 61.9 | 11 | -82.2% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 25.3 | 7 | -72.3% |
Permian Resources Corporation has traded in a 6x–77x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~14x. Matador Resources Company has traded in a 6x–25x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~8x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permian Resources C… (PR) | -3.55 | 1.28 | +136.1% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | -1.07 | 6.09 | +669.2% |
Permian Resources Corporation's EPS grew from $-3.55 (2016) to $1.28 (2025). Matador Resources Company's EPS grew from $-1.07 (2016) to $6.09 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Permian Resources Corporation generated $4B FCF in 2025 (+1717% vs 2021). Matador Resources Company generated $2B FCF in 2025 (+658% vs 2021).
PR vs MTDR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PR or MTDR a better buy right now?
Matador Resources Company (MTDR) offers the better valuation at 8.4x trailing P/E (11.6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Permian Resources Corporation (PR) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PR or MTDR?
On trailing P/E, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the cheapest at 8.4x versus Permian Resources Corporation at 14.3x. On forward P/E, Matador Resources Company is actually cheaper at 11.6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PR or MTDR?
Over the past 5 years, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) delivered a total return of +390.6%, compared to +149.6% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). A $10,000 investment in PR five years ago would be worth approximately $49K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +240.8% versus PR's +99.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PR or MTDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.34β versus Matador Resources Company's 1.40β — meaning MTDR is approximately 4% more volatile than PR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Permian Resources Corporation (PR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 35% for Matador Resources Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — PR or MTDR?
Permian Resources Corporation (PR) is the more profitable company, earning 24.0% net margin versus 20.5% for Matador Resources Company — meaning it keeps 24.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PR leads at 37.5% versus 33.2% for MTDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 88.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is PR or MTDR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) trades at 11.6x forward P/E versus 16.3x for Permian Resources Corporation — 4.7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTDR: 10.3% to $56.67.
07Which pays a better dividend — PR or MTDR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Permian Resources Corporation (PR) offers the highest yield at 3.3%, versus 2.5% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR).
08Is PR or MTDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.5% yield, +240.8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +240.8%, PR: +99.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PR and MTDR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.