Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PRKS vs MSGE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
PRKS vs MSGE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $3.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.66B | $1.16B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $168M | $42M |
| Gross Margin | 92.3% | 31.5% |
| Operating Margin | 22.0% | 10.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 56.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $43M |
PRKS vs MSGE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.2 | -15.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRKS vs MSGE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs MSGE's -24.6%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 56.8x)
- 10.1% margin vs MSGE's 3.6%
MSGE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.94
- Rev growth -1.7%, EPS growth -74.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, current ratio 0.47x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.7% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 56.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs MSGE's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs PRKS's 1.54 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.6% vs PRKS's -18.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs MSGE's 1.8%, ROIC 25.5% vs 8.5% |
PRKS vs MSGE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRKS vs MSGE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS and MSGE operate at a comparable scale, with $1.7B and $1.2B in trailing revenue. PRKS is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MSGE's 3.6%. On growth, MSGE holds the edge at +59.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $540M | $245M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $168M | $42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $263M | $289M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.3% | +31.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +10.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +25.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.8% | +59.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -44.0% | -123.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 86% valuation discount to MSGE's 86.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGE's 24.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.9B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.11x | 86.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.99x | 56.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.56x | 23.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 3.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.68x | 33.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs PRKS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +25.5% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$100M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.69x | 4.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSGE five years ago would be worth $7,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,903 for PRKS. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +83.6% total return vs PRKS's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.9% vs PRKS's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | +22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.7% | +83.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.3% | +94.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.0% | -26.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.5% | -24.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.1% | +24.9% |
Risk & Volatility
MSGE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSGE is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRKS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs PRKS's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.54x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.95 | $69.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.77 | $35.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.1% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.8 | 67.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 944K | 312K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRKS as "Buy" and MSGE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.4% upside for PRKS (target: $48) vs -0.6% for MSGE (target: $66).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.60 | $66.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +1.3% |
PRKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MSGE leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
PRKS vs MSGE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRKS or MSGE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) is the stronger pick with -1. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRKS or MSGE?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 86. 6x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRKS or MSGE?
Over the past 5 years, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) delivered a total return of -26. 2%, compared to -31. 0% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus MSGE's -24. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRKS or MSGE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning PRKS is approximately 64% more volatile than MSGE relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — PRKS or MSGE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) is pulling ahead at -1. 7% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Parks & Resorts Inc. grew EPS -19. 3% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MSGE leads at 13. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRKS or MSGE?
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus 4. 0% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus 13. 0% for MSGE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRKS or MSGE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 56. 8x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 46. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRKS: 28. 4% to $47. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRKS or MSGE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PRKS or MSGE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
(MSGE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94)). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSGE: -24. 6%, PRKS: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRKS and MSGE?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRKS (Consumer Cyclical) and MSGE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRKS is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 29%
- Gross Margin > 18%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.