PRLB
Proto Labs, Inc.
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Market Cap$1.62B
5Y Perf.-25.9%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$389M
5Y Perf.-77.5%
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$3.95B
5Y Perf.-10.2%
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.
Computer Hardware
Market Cap$707M
5Y Perf.-68.3%
PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PRLB | NNDM | XMTR | SSYS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Computer Hardware | Industrial - Machinery | Computer Hardware |
| Market Cap | $1.62B | $389M | $3.95B | $707M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $546M | $118M | $741M | $551M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $-338M | $-52M | $-104M |
| Gross Margin | 44.9% | 34.4% | 39.3% | 43.6% |
| Operating Margin | 5.8% | -61.8% | -4.8% | -11.7% |
| Forward P/E | 37.5x | 185.0x | 117.0x | 69.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $9M | $349M | $27M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $111M | $205M | $15M | $95M |
PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PRLB
NNDM
XMTR
SSYS
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) | 100 | 74.1 | -25.9% |
| Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) | 100 | 89.8 | -10.2% |
| Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS) | 100 | 31.7 | -68.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: PRLB leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Nano Dimension Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. XMTR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PRLB
Proto Labs, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
PRLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 13.7% 10Y total return vs XMTR's -10.2%
- Lower P/E (37.5x vs 69.8x)
- 4.7% margin vs NNDM's -286.7%
- 3.4% ROA vs NNDM's -48.4%, ROIC 3.4% vs -15.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
NNDM
Nano Dimension Ltd.
The Income Pick
NNDM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.74
- Rev growth 77.3%, EPS growth -211.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 10.02x
- Beta 1.74, current ratio 10.02x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
XMTR
Xometry, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
XMTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +162.1% vs SSYS's -15.6%
Best for: momentum
SSYS
Stratasys Ltd.
The Secondary Option
SSYS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NNDM | 77.3% revenue growth vs SSYS's -3.7% |
| Value | PRLB | Lower P/E (37.5x vs 69.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | PRLB | 4.7% margin vs NNDM's -286.7% |
| Stability / Safety | NNDM | Beta 1.74 vs XMTR's 1.94, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | XMTR | +162.1% vs SSYS's -15.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PRLB | 3.4% ROA vs NNDM's -48.4%, ROIC 3.4% vs -15.2% |
PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPRLBLAGGINGSSYS
Who Leads Where
PRLB leads in 2 of 6 categories
XMTR leads 1 • NNDM leads 0 • SSYS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓SSYSStratasys Ltd.
0leads
NNDMNano Dimension Ltd.
0leads
XMTRXometry, Inc.
1leads
PRLBProto Labs, Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XMTRvs NNDMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PRLB5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PRLB7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XMTR4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRLB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XMTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $741M annually — 6.3x NNDM's $118M. PRLB is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NNDM's -2.9%. On growth, NNDM holds the edge at +106.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | XMTRXometry, Inc. | SSYSStratasys Ltd. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $546M | $118M | $741M | $551M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $57M | -$54M | -$21M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | -$338M | -$52M | -$104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $65M | -$105M | -$11M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.9% | +34.4% | +39.3% | +43.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | -61.8% | -4.8% | -11.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | -2.9% | -7.0% | -18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | -89.2% | -1.5% | -1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.4% | +106.4% | +35.9% | -6.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +120.0% | +100.0% | +66.7% | +62.7% |
PRLB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRLB and NNDM and XMTR and SSYS each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | XMTRXometry, Inc. | SSYSStratasys Ltd. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $389M | $4.0B | $707M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $194M | $4.3B | $639M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 77.34x | -1.35x | -64.34x | -6.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 37.53x | 185.00x | 116.97x | 69.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.21x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.04x | 3.80x | 5.76x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.46x | 0.72x | 14.41x | 0.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.14x | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — PRLB and NNDM and XMTR and SSYS each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRLB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRLB delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-59 for NNDM. PRLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRLB scores 6/9 vs NNDM's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | XMTRXometry, Inc. | SSYSStratasys Ltd. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | -58.7% | -18.8% | -12.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | -48.4% | -7.3% | -9.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.4% | -15.2% | -5.7% | -5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.8% | -12.6% | -7.5% | -6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x | 1.26x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$106M | -$195M | $334M | -$68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $111M | $205M | $15M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $9M | $349M | $27M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -45.71x | -20.58x | — |
PRLB leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XMTR five years ago would be worth $8,983 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,774 for NNDM. Over the past 12 months, XMTR leads with a +162.1% total return vs SSYS's -15.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 81.1% vs SSYS's -17.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | XMTRXometry, Inc. | SSYSStratasys Ltd. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.5% | +18.6% | +25.1% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.0% | +16.4% | +162.1% | -15.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.6% | -30.2% | +493.8% | -42.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.9% | -72.3% | -10.2% | -59.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.7% | -97.5% | -10.2% | -60.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.6% | -11.3% | +81.1% | -17.0% |
XMTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRLB and NNDM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NNDM is the less volatile stock with a 1.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XMTR's 1.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRLB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs SSYS's 64.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | XMTRXometry, Inc. | SSYSStratasys Ltd. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.74x | 1.94x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.00 | $2.32 | $82.11 | $12.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.15 | $1.31 | $29.60 | $7.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +79.7% | +95.6% | +64.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.4 | 59.6 | 68.8 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 145K | 2.0M | 840K | 818K |
Evenly matched — PRLB and NNDM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRLB as "Hold", XMTR as "Buy", SSYS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for SSYS (target: $14) vs -43.4% for PRLB (target: $39).
| Metric | PRLBProto Labs, Inc. | NNDMNano Dimension Lt… | XMTRXometry, Inc. | SSYSStratasys Ltd. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.50 | — | $64.33 | $13.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | — | 14 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.7% | +6.4% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
PRLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). XMTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallProto Labs, Inc. (PRLB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PRLB vs NNDM vs XMTR vs SSYS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is the stronger pick with 77. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) offers the better valuation at 77. 3x trailing P/E (37. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS?
On forward P/E, Proto Labs, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 37. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS?
Over the past 5 years, Xometry, Inc.
(XMTR) delivered a total return of -10. 2%, compared to -72. 3% for Nano Dimension Ltd. (NNDM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRLB returned +13. 7% versus NNDM's -97. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 74β versus Xometry, Inc. 's 1. 94β — meaning XMTR is approximately 11% more volatile than NNDM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is pulling ahead at 77. 3% versus -3. 7% for Stratasys Ltd. (SSYS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Proto Labs, Inc. grew EPS 33. 3% year-over-year, compared to -211. 4% for Nano Dimension Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNDM leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS?
Proto Labs, Inc.
(PRLB) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus -98. 0% for Nano Dimension Ltd. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRLB leads at 4. 9% versus -89. 7% for NNDM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SSYS leads at 47. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Proto Labs, Inc.
(PRLB) trades at 37. 5x forward P/E versus 185. 0x for Nano Dimension Ltd. — 147. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSYS: 64. 6% to $13. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PRLB or NNDM or XMTR or SSYS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nano Dimension Ltd.
(NNDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 94 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NNDM: -97. 5%, XMTR: -10. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRLB and NNDM and XMTR and SSYS?
These companies operate in different sectors (PRLB (Industrials) and NNDM (Technology) and XMTR (Industrials) and SSYS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PRLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNDM is a small-cap high-growth stock; XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; SSYS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PRLB: 10.4% · NNDM: 106.4%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.