Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PRVA vs DOCS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
PRVA vs DOCS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $3.01B | $5.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.25B | $638M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.08B | $239M |
| Gross Margin | 7.0% | 89.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.6% | 37.4% |
| Forward P/E | 68.5x | 16.8x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $480M | $210M |
PRVA vs DOCS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Privia Health Group… (PRVA) | 100 | 54.1 | -45.9% |
| Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) | 100 | 44.7 | -55.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PRVA vs DOCS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PRVA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.3%, EPS growth 63.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.1%
- 4.3% 10Y total return vs DOCS's -50.9%
- 22.3% revenue growth vs DOCS's 20.0%
DOCS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 6.97x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 6.97x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.3% revenue growth vs DOCS's 20.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 68.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 137.2% margin vs DOCS's 37.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs PRVA's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.9% vs DOCS's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.7% ROA vs PRVA's 0.9%, ROIC 20.0% vs 9.9% |
PRVA vs DOCS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
PRVA vs DOCS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOCS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 3.5x DOCS's $638M. PRVA is the more profitable business, keeping 137.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOCS's 37.5%. On growth, PRVA holds the edge at +25.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.2B | $638M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $48M | $250M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.1B | $239M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$49.3B | $314M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +89.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +37.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +137.2% | +37.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -21.9% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.8% | +9.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | -16.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PRVA and DOCS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.5x trailing earnings, DOCS trades at a 82% valuation discount to PRVA's 133.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DOCS's 21.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRVA's 57.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 133.28x | 23.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 68.48x | 16.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 57.62x | 21.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 9.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.91x | 4.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.58x | 19.64x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DOCS delivers a 24.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $2 for PRVA. DOCS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRVA's 0.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DOCS scores 9/9 vs PRVA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.5% | +24.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +20.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +20.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +22.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$470M | -$197M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $480M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRVA five years ago would be worth $7,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,911 for DOCS. Over the past 12 months, PRVA leads with a +2.9% total return vs DOCS's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRVA at -7.1% vs DOCS's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -39.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.9% | -55.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.8% | -24.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.1% | -50.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.3% | -50.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -7.1% | -8.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PRVA and DOCS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOCS is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRVA's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRVA currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs DOCS's 34.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $26.51 | $76.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.77 | $20.55 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +34.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 901K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PRVA as "Buy" and DOCS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.4% upside for DOCS (target: $43) vs 32.0% for PRVA (target: $32).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.67 | $42.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
DOCS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PRVA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
PRVA vs DOCS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PRVA or DOCS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) is the stronger pick with 22. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 0% for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) offers the better valuation at 23. 5x trailing P/E (16. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Privia Health Group, Inc. (PRVA) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PRVA or DOCS?
On trailing P/E, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the cheapest at 23. 5x versus Privia Health Group, Inc. at 133. 3x. On forward P/E, Doximity, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PRVA or DOCS?
Over the past 5 years, Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) delivered a total return of -26. 1%, compared to -50. 9% for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRVA returned +4. 3% versus DOCS's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PRVA or DOCS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Privia Health Group, Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning PRVA is approximately 0% more volatile than DOCS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 1% for Privia Health Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PRVA or DOCS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) is pulling ahead at 22. 3% versus 20. 0% for Doximity, Inc. (DOCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Privia Health Group, Inc. grew EPS 63. 6% year-over-year, compared to 54. 2% for Doximity, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOCS leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PRVA or DOCS?
Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus 1. 1% for Privia Health Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus 1. 6% for PRVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PRVA or DOCS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Doximity, Inc.
(DOCS) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 68. 5x for Privia Health Group, Inc. — 51. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DOCS: 64. 4% to $42. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — PRVA or DOCS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is PRVA or DOCS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Privia Health Group, Inc.
(PRVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRVA: +4. 3%, DOCS: -50. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PRVA and DOCS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.