Comprehensive Stock Comparison

Compare Public Storage (PSA) vs CubeSmart (CUBE) Stock

Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.

Tickers 2 / 10100+ Metrics

Selected Stocks

Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Quick Verdict

CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthPSA2.7% revenue growth vs CUBE's 1.5%
ValueCUBELower P/E (28.7x vs 30.5x), PEG 0.92 vs 4.10
Quality / MarginsPSA39.5% net margin vs CUBE's 32.2%
Stability / SafetyPSABeta 0.45 vs CUBE's 0.53
DividendsCUBE4.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; PSA pays no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)PSA+5.1% vs CUBE's +4.7%
Efficiency (ROA)PSA9.4% ROA vs CUBE's 5.3%, ROIC 13.5% vs 6.1%
Bottom line: PSA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the stronger pick for investors who prioritize growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. CubeSmart is the better choice for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As direct sector peers, they can serve as alternatives in the same portfolio allocation.

Who Each Stock Is For

Income & stability

Growth exposure

Long-term compounding (10Y)

Sleep-well-at-night portfolio

Valuation efficiency (growth/$)

Defensive / Recession hedge

Business Model

What each company does and how it makes money

PSAPublic Storage
Real Estate

Public Storage is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates self-storage facilities across the United States and Europe. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from storage units — with additional income from tenant insurance, truck rentals, and property management services — making it one of the largest self-storage operators globally. The company's competitive advantage lies in its massive scale, prime locations, and strong brand recognition that creates pricing power and operational efficiency.

CUBECubeSmart
Real Estate

CubeSmart is a real estate investment trust that owns and operates self-storage facilities across the United States. It generates revenue primarily through rental income from storage units—with additional income from tenant insurance, truck rentals, and packing supplies—with property operations contributing over 90% of total revenue. The company's competitive advantage lies in its national brand recognition, technology-enabled customer experience, and strategic locations in high-demand metropolitan areas.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PSAPublic Storage
FY 2024
Self Storage Operations
93.6%$4.4B
Ancillary Operations
6.4%$300M
CUBECubeSmart
FY 2024
Other Property Related Income
73.3%$114M
Property Management Fee Income
26.7%$41M

Financial Metrics Comparison

Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging

Financial Scorecard

PSA 4CUBE 2
Financial MetricsPSA5/6 metrics
Valuation MetricsCUBE6/7 metrics
Profitability & EfficiencyPSA4/7 metrics
Total ReturnsPSA5/6 metrics
Risk & VolatilityPSA2/2 metrics
Analyst OutlookCUBE1/1 metrics

PSA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CUBE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Financial Metrics (TTM)

PSA is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.8B annually — 4.3x CUBE's $1.1B. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CUBE's 32.2%.

MetricPSAPublic StorageCUBECubeSmart
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.8B$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$3.7B$711M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.9B$357M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.1B$651M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+73.0%+63.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+53.0%+41.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+39.5%+32.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+65.2%+58.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+3.1%+5.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.3%-18.2%
PSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

At 23.9x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 30% valuation discount to PSA's 34.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 0.76x vs PSA's 4.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricPSAPublic StorageCUBECubeSmart
Market CapShares × price$53.9B$9.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$63.8B$12.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS34.08x23.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.53x28.70x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.57x0.76x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.00x17.95x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.17x8.80x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.78x3.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.91x14.87x
CUBE leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PSA delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $13 for CUBE. CUBE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSA's 1.10x.

MetricPSAPublic StorageCUBECubeSmart
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.1%+12.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.4%+5.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+13.5%+6.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.1%+8.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.10x1.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$9.9B$3.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$318M$72M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10.3B$3.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense11.19x
PSA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (with DRIP)

A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth $16,046 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,844 for CUBE. Over the past 12 months, PSA leads with a +5.1% total return vs CUBE's +4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSA at 4.7% vs CUBE's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPSAPublic StorageCUBECubeSmart
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+18.8%+17.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+5.1%+4.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+14.8%+0.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+60.5%+38.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.9%+88.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+4.7%+0.2%
PSA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

PSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CUBE's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricPSAPublic StorageCUBECubeSmart
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.45x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$322.49$44.13
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$256.54$34.24
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.2%+93.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10064.263.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded959K2.0M
PSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Wall Street rates PSA as "Hold" and CUBE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.5% upside for CUBE (target: $42) vs -1.9% for PSA (target: $301). CUBE is the only dividend payer here at 4.94% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPSAPublic StorageCUBECubeSmart
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$301.22$41.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts3629
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
CUBE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Historical Charts

Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.

Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)

StockMar 20Feb 26Change
Public Storage (PSA)100123.97+24.0%
CubeSmart (CUBE)100116.58+16.6%

Public Storage (PSA) returned +60% over 5 years vs CubeSmart (CUBE)'s +38%. A $10,000 investment in PSA 5 years ago would be worth $16,046 today (including dividends reinvested).

Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Public Storage (PSA)$2.6B$4.8B+88.4%
CubeSmart (CUBE)$510M$1.1B+109.0%

Public Storage's revenue grew from $2.6B (2016) to $4.8B (2025) — a 7.3% CAGR.

Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Public Storage (PSA)56.8%37.3%-34.4%
CubeSmart (CUBE)17.2%36.7%+112.9%

Public Storage's net margin went from 57% (2016) to 37% (2025).

Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 9 Years

Stock20172025Change
Public Storage (PSA)31.128.8-7.4%
CubeSmart (CUBE)39.124.9-36.3%

Public Storage has traded in a 12x–38x P/E range over 9 years; current trailing P/E is ~34x. CubeSmart has traded in a 25x–72x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~24x.

Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years

Stock20162025Change
Public Storage (PSA)6.819.01+32.3%
CubeSmart (CUBE)0.451.72+282.2%

Public Storage's EPS grew from $6.81 (2016) to $9.01 (2025) — a 3% CAGR.

Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years

2021
$2B
$449M
2022
$3B
$591M
2023
$3B
$611M
2024
$3B
$631M
2025
$3B
Public Storage (PSA)CubeSmart (CUBE)

Public Storage generated $3B FCF in 2025 (+40% vs 2021). CubeSmart generated $631M FCF in 2024 (+40% vs 2021).

Loading custom metrics...

PSA vs CUBE: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PSA or CUBE a better buy right now?

CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 23.9x trailing P/E (28.7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Public Storage (PSA) a "Hold" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PSA or CUBE?

On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 23.9x versus Public Storage at 34.1x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28.7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 0.92x versus Public Storage's 4.10x — a PEG below 1.0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PSA or CUBE?

Over the past 5 years, Public Storage (PSA) delivered a total return of +60.5%, compared to +38.4% for CubeSmart (CUBE). A $10,000 investment in PSA five years ago would be worth approximately $16K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CUBE returned +88.4% versus PSA's +64.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PSA or CUBE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Public Storage (PSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.45β versus CubeSmart's 0.53β — meaning CUBE is approximately 17% more volatile than PSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CubeSmart (CUBE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 103% versus 110% for Public Storage — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which has better profit margins — PSA or CUBE?

Public Storage (PSA) is the more profitable company, earning 37.3% net margin versus 36.7% for CubeSmart — meaning it keeps 37.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSA leads at 70.6% versus 45.3% for CUBE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSA leads at 72.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is PSA or CUBE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential. By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0.92x versus Public Storage's 4.10x. A PEG below 1.0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28.7x forward P/E versus 30.5x for Public Storage — 1.8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CUBE: 1.5% to $41.75.

07

Which pays a better dividend — PSA or CUBE?

In this comparison, CUBE (4.9% yield) pays a dividend. PSA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is PSA or CUBE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.53), 4.9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CUBE: +88.4%, PSA: +64.9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between PSA and CUBE?

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: PSA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CUBE pays a dividend while PSA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.

💎
Stocks Like

PSA

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
🛡️
Stocks Like

CUBE

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Better Than Both

Find stocks that beat PSA and CUBE on the metrics you choose

Revenue Growth>
%
(PSA: 3.1% · CUBE: 5.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(PSA: 39.5% · CUBE: 32.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(PSA: 34.1x · CUBE: 23.9x)