Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $68M | $3.06B | $4.54B | $4.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $566M | $676M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $52M | $331M | $546M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 47.5% | 40.6% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 63.7% | 50.1% | 44.4% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 6.5x | 7.8x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $429M | $576M | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $79M | $117M | $752M |
PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Shippin… (PSHG) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) | 100 | 319.9 | +219.9% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 404.0 | +304.0% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 475.8 | +375.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSHG is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 6.6x)
DHT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.9%
- Rev growth -13.0%, EPS growth 17.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.1%
- 3.9% yield, vs STNG's 2.0%
- 21.3% ROA vs PSHG's 9.4%, ROIC 8.9% vs 13.3%
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 10.3% 10Y total return vs DHT's 318.2%
- -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- 80.8% margin vs STNG's 48.4%
- +162.3% vs PSHG's +10.2%
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.22, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.22 vs PSHG's 0.72
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 6.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs STNG's 48.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs PSHG's 0.72 | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +162.3% vs PSHG's +10.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.3% ROA vs PSHG's 9.4%, ROIC 8.9% vs 13.3% |
PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSHG leads in 1 of 6 categories
INSW leads 1 • DHT leads 0 • STNG leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PSHG and INSW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 13.0x PSHG's $80M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STNG's 48.4%. On growth, DHT holds the edge at +57.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $566M | $676M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $64M | $388M | $465M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $52M | $331M | $546M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$131M | $122M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +47.5% | +40.6% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +50.1% | +44.4% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +65.4% | +58.6% | +80.8% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | -23.1% | +18.0% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +57.3% | -91.3% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.5% | +2.8% | +4.8% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PSHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 89% valuation discount to INSW's 14.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DHT's 12.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $3.1B | $4.5B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $3.4B | $5.0B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.62x | 14.50x | 14.71x | 12.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.49x | 7.81x | 6.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.80x | 12.34x | 10.63x | 8.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 6.15x | 5.38x | 4.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 2.70x | 2.25x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.43x | — | 118.95x | 8.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PSHG and DHT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DHT delivers a 29.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $16 for STNG. PSHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DHT's 0.38x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DHT scores 7/9 vs PSHG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | +29.1% | +27.1% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +21.3% | +20.1% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +8.9% | +9.4% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +11.7% | +12.1% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.38x | 0.29x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | $350M | $459M | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $79M | $117M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $429M | $576M | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.08x | 25.61x | 0.90x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $54,998 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $268 for PSHG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +162.3% total return vs PSHG's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 41.5% vs STNG's 24.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.0% | +65.3% | +99.6% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +81.1% | +162.3% | +111.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.7% | +167.6% | +183.5% | +92.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +286.6% | +450.0% | +350.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +318.2% | +1029.1% | +62.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.1% | +38.8% | +41.5% | +24.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — INSW and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSHG's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs PSHG's 67.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.28x | 0.41x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.58 | $20.55 | $92.66 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $10.61 | $35.60 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.1% | +92.5% | +98.9% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 59.5 | 73.0 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 4.6M | 594K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DHT and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DHT as "Buy", INSW as "Buy", STNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 2.3% upside for STNG (target: $86) vs -5.4% for INSW (target: $87). For income investors, DHT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.89% vs STNG's 2.00%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $86.67 | $86.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 | 13 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +3.9% | +3.2% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $0.74 | $2.92 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
PSHG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). INSW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
PSHG vs DHT vs INSW vs STNG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus International Seaways, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, DHT Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +450. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1029% versus PSHG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Performance Shipping Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning PSHG is approximately 222% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 38% for DHT Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DHT Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 17. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG?
Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus 36. 7% for International Seaways, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, DHT Holdings, Inc.
(DHT) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 7. 8x for International Seaways, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STNG: 2. 3% to $86. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
09Is PSHG or DHT or INSW or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41), 3. 2% yield, +1029% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1029%, PSHG: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSHG and DHT and INSW and STNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (PSHG (Industrials) and DHT (Energy) and INSW (Energy) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.