Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PSHG vs STNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
PSHG vs STNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $71M | $4.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $52M | $502M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 63.7% | 38.8% |
| Forward P/E | 1.7x | 8.6x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $619M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $752M |
PSHG vs STNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Shippin… (PSHG) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 477.4 | +377.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSHG vs STNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -19.7%, EPS growth -44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.8%
- -19.7% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6%
- Lower P/E (1.7x vs 8.6x)
STNG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 2.0%
- 62.8% 10Y total return vs PSHG's -99.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -19.7% revenue growth vs STNG's -24.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.7x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 65.4% margin vs STNG's 48.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs PSHG's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, vs STNG's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.3% vs PSHG's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs PSHG's 9.4%, ROIC 7.2% vs 13.3% |
PSHG vs STNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PSHG vs STNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PSHG and STNG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 13.0x PSHG's $80M. PSHG is the more profitable business, keeping 65.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STNG's 48.4%. On growth, STNG holds the edge at +46.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $64M | $580M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $52M | $502M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | $389M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +38.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +65.4% | +48.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | +37.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | +46.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.5% | +2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PSHG leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 86% valuation discount to STNG's 12.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than STNG's 8.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $71M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.69x | 12.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.86x | 8.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 4.67x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.26x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.69x | 8.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $16 for STNG. PSHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STNG's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STNG scores 6/9 vs PSHG's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +12.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +8.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | -$133M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $752M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $619M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.08x | 6.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STNG five years ago would be worth $45,904 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $271 for PSHG. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs PSHG's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSHG at 34.1% vs STNG's 24.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | +71.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +14.6% | +115.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.3% | +92.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +359.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +62.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | +24.4% |
Risk & Volatility
STNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
STNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSHG's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. STNG currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs PSHG's 70.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.68x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.58 | $87.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $37.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 139K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PSHG and STNG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, PSHG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs STNG's 1.99%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $85.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $1.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
PSHG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). STNG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
PSHG vs STNG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSHG or STNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the stronger pick with -19. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSHG or STNG?
On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus Scorpio Tankers Inc. at 12. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSHG or STNG?
Over the past 5 years, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) delivered a total return of +359. 0%, compared to -97. 3% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STNG returned +62. 8% versus PSHG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSHG or STNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Performance Shipping Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning PSHG is approximately 141% more volatile than STNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 19% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSHG or STNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is pulling ahead at -19. 7% versus -24. 6% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Performance Shipping Inc. grew EPS -44. 0% year-over-year, compared to -46. 5% for Scorpio Tankers Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSHG or STNG?
Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus 36. 7% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus 33. 0% for STNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — PSHG or STNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the highest yield at 2. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG).
08Is PSHG or STNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Scorpio Tankers Inc.
(STNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (STNG: +62. 8%, PSHG: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PSHG and STNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (PSHG (Industrials) and STNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.