PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.
Marine Shipping
Market Cap$68M
5Y Perf.-98.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
PSHG vs TEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+228.1%
PSHG vs TEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | PSHG | TEN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $68M | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $779M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $52M | $110M |
| Gross Margin | 55.4% | 33.4% |
| Operating Margin | 63.7% | 27.0% |
| Forward P/E | 1.6x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $1.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $70M | $348M |
PSHG vs TEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
PSHG
TEN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Shippin… (PSHG) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Tsakos Energy Navig… (TEN) | 100 | 328.1 | +228.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSHG vs TEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: TEN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Performance Shipping Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.
The Growth Play
PSHG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -19.7%, EPS growth -44.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 33.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 5.29x
- Lower P/E (1.6x vs 6.5x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
TEN
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
The Income Pick
TEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 5.6%
- 76.7% 10Y total return vs PSHG's -99.8%
- Beta 0.31, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.10x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | TEN | -9.6% revenue growth vs PSHG's -19.7% |
| Value | PSHG | Lower P/E (1.6x vs 6.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | PSHG | 65.4% margin vs TEN's 14.1% |
| Stability / Safety | TEN | Beta 0.31 vs PSHG's 0.72 |
| Dividends | TEN | 5.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PSHG's 2.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TEN | +164.1% vs PSHG's +10.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PSHG | 9.4% ROA vs TEN's 3.0%, ROIC 13.3% vs 6.9% |
PSHG vs TEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2021
PSHG vs TEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPSHGLAGGINGTEN
TENTsakos Energy Navigat…
3leads
PSHGPerformance Shipping …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TENMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PSHG5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PSHG4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PSHG8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
TEN6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
TEN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
TEN2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $779M annually — 9.8x PSHG's $80M. PSHG is the more profitable business, keeping 65.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TEN's 14.1%. On growth, TEN holds the edge at -9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | PSHGPerformance Shipp… | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $779M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $64M | $327M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $52M | $110M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$35M | -$503M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.4% | +33.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +63.7% | +27.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +65.4% | +14.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -44.4% | -64.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.0% | -9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -70.5% | -71.6% |
PSHG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PSHG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, PSHG trades at a 81% valuation discount to TEN's 8.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSHG's 0.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TEN's 6.5x.
| Metric | PSHGPerformance Shipp… | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $68M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.62x | 8.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 6.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.80x | 6.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.25x | 0.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.43x | — |
PSHG leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSHG delivers a 16.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $6 for TEN. PSHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TEN's 1.00x.
| Metric | PSHGPerformance Shipp… | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.5% | +6.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 1.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$23M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $70M | $348M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.08x | 2.06x |
PSHG leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TEN five years ago would be worth $48,787 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $268 for PSHG. Over the past 12 months, TEN leads with a +164.1% total return vs PSHG's +10.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TEN at 42.7% vs PSHG's 32.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | PSHGPerformance Shipp… | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.0% | +102.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.2% | +164.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.7% | +190.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +387.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +76.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.1% | +42.7% |
TEN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PSHG's 0.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TEN currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs PSHG's 67.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | PSHGPerformance Shipp… | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.58 | $44.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.40 | $17.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 70.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 142K | 484K |
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, TEN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.56% vs PSHG's 2.70%.
| Metric | PSHGPerformance Shipp… | TENTsakos Energy Nav… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $50.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +5.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.05 | $2.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
PSHG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TEN leads in 3 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
Best OverallPerformance Shipping Inc. (PSHG)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
PSHG vs TEN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSHG or TEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger pick with -9.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 7% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSHG or TEN?
On trailing P/E, Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the cheapest at 1. 6x versus Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited at 8. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSHG or TEN?
Over the past 5 years, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) delivered a total return of +387.
9%, compared to -97. 3% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TEN returned +76. 7% versus PSHG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSHG or TEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
31β versus Performance Shipping Inc. 's 0. 72β — meaning PSHG is approximately 130% more volatile than TEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 100% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSHG or TEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is pulling ahead at -9.
6% versus -19. 7% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Performance Shipping Inc. grew EPS -44. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 4% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, PSHG leads at 33. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSHG or TEN?
Performance Shipping Inc.
(PSHG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 0% net margin versus 21. 9% for Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited — meaning it keeps 50. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSHG leads at 47. 8% versus 34. 6% for TEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PSHG leads at 57. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — PSHG or TEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 2. 7% for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG).
08Is PSHG or TEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited (TEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
31), 5. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TEN: +76. 7%, PSHG: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between PSHG and TEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (PSHG (Industrials) and TEN (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(PSHG: -19.0% · TEN: -9.7%)Net Margin>
%
(PSHG: 65.4% · TEN: 14.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(PSHG: 1.6x · TEN: 8.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.