REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Diversified
REIT - Retail
PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $801M | $616M | $354M | $1M | $2.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $100M | $166M | $76M | $10M | $301M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $21M | $-10M | $-10M | $117M |
| Gross Margin | 90.7% | -11.7% | 87.4% | 74.1% | 98.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.2% | 27.9% | 78.6% | -66.7% | 56.0% |
| Forward P/E | 40.1x | 83.0x | — | — | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $405M | $856M | $0.00 | $70M | $1.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $11M | $27M | $613K | $12M |
PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Postal Realty Trust… (PSTL) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| Gladstone Commercia… (GOOD) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| Gladstone Land Corp… (LAND) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
| Generation Income P… (GIPR) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| Four Corners Proper… (FCPT) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PSTL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 10.72x
- Beta 0.30, yield 5.5%, current ratio 10.72x
- +86.3% vs GIPR's -83.8%
GOOD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, LAND doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.8%
- 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7%
- 100.0% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5%
FCPT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 5.5%
- 99.1% 10Y total return vs PSTL's 69.1%
- 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2%
- Beta 0.14 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.9% FFO/revenue growth vs LAND's -10.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.7% margin vs GIPR's -103.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs GIPR's 1.73, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, vs FCPT's 5.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.3% vs GIPR's -83.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GIPR's -9.5%, ROIC 4.5% vs -4.0% |
PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
GIPR leads 1 • PSTL leads 1 • GOOD leads 0 • LAND leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $301M annually — 30.2x GIPR's $10M. FCPT is the more profitable business, keeping 38.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GIPR's -103.2%. On growth, LAND holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $100M | $166M | $76M | $10M | $301M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $62M | $106M | $94M | -$1M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $21M | -$10M | -$10M | $117M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $90M | $5M | $654,400 | $188M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.7% | -11.7% | +87.4% | +74.1% | +98.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.2% | +27.9% | +78.6% | -66.7% | +56.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +12.7% | -13.8% | -103.2% | +38.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +38.2% | +54.1% | +6.2% | +6.6% | +62.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +11.8% | +38.6% | +2.9% | +9.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.3% | +2.8% | +66.7% | +5.5% | +7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GIPR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, FCPT trades at a 52% valuation discount to PSTL's 48.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOD offers better value at 0.88x vs FCPT's 118.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $801M | $616M | $354M | $1M | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $1.5B | $327M | $71M | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.55x | 31.02x | -33.62x | -0.17x | 23.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.11x | 82.97x | — | — | 21.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.88x | — | — | 118.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.65x | 12.36x | 3.46x | — | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.36x | 3.82x | 4.65x | 0.15x | 9.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 1.76x | 0.53x | 0.04x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.33x | 9.17x | 50.62x | 1.39x | 14.54x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCPT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GOOD delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-32 for GIPR. FCPT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.74x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GOOD's 2.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PSTL scores 7/9 vs LAND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.5% | +9.7% | -1.6% | -32.2% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +1.7% | -0.8% | -9.5% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +4.4% | +4.9% | -4.0% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +5.3% | +4.7% | -5.0% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.13x | 2.50x | — | 2.14x | 0.74x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $403M | $846M | -$27M | $70M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $11M | $27M | $612,939 | $12M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $405M | $856M | $0 | $70M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.19x | 1.46x | 2.99x | -1.20x | 3.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PSTL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PSTL five years ago would be worth $13,579 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,333 for GIPR. Over the past 12 months, PSTL leads with a +86.3% total return vs GIPR's -83.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PSTL at 19.3% vs GIPR's -42.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.1% | +21.6% | +8.8% | -60.4% | +11.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +0.7% | +11.2% | -83.8% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.8% | +43.8% | -27.5% | -81.0% | +14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | -9.7% | -43.8% | -76.7% | +17.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.1% | +51.0% | +42.9% | -56.3% | +99.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.3% | +12.9% | -10.2% | -42.5% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PSTL and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCPT is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIPR's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSTL currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs GIPR's 13.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.30x | 0.55x | 0.68x | 1.73x | 0.14x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.49 | $15.03 | $13.00 | $1.99 | $28.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.51 | $10.33 | $8.47 | $0.23 | $22.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.1% | +84.6% | +75.0% | +13.1% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.0 | 49.1 | 41.0 | 42.9 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 249K | 390K | 543K | 1.1M | 658K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GIPR and FCPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSTL as "Buy", GOOD as "Buy", LAND as "Buy", FCPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for FCPT (target: $27) vs -2.1% for PSTL (target: $22). For income investors, GIPR offers the higher dividend yield at 99.97% vs FCPT's 5.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.33 | $13.00 | $10.00 | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 14 | 11 | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | +11.4% | +6.7% | +100.0% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.26 | $1.44 | $0.66 | $0.26 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FCPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GIPR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
PSTL vs GOOD vs LAND vs GIPR vs FCPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Postal Realty Trust, Inc. (PSTL) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT?
On trailing P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Postal Realty Trust, Inc. at 48. 6x. On forward P/E, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Gladstone Commercial Corporation wins at 2. 34x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT?
Over the past 5 years, Postal Realty Trust, Inc.
(PSTL) delivered a total return of +35. 8%, compared to -76. 7% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCPT returned +99. 1% versus GIPR's -56. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus Generation Income Properties, Inc. 's 1. 73β — meaning GIPR is approximately 1113% more volatile than FCPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 74% versus 3% for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Generation Income Properties, Inc.
(GIPR) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -10. 7% for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Postal Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 123. 8% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Gladstone Land Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GIPR leads at 35. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT?
Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the more profitable company, earning 38. 2% net margin versus -85. 5% for Generation Income Properties, Inc. — meaning it keeps 38. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAND leads at 78. 6% versus -52. 6% for GIPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCPT leads at 95. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 34x versus Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. 's 118. 24x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 83. 0x for Gladstone Commercial Corporation — 61. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FCPT: 6. 0% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 5. 5% for Four Corners Property Trust, Inc. (FCPT).
09Is PSTL or GOOD or LAND or GIPR or FCPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc.
(FCPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 14), 5. 5% yield). Generation Income Properties, Inc. (GIPR) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCPT: +99. 1%, GIPR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PSTL and GOOD and LAND and GIPR and FCPT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PSTL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOOD is a small-cap income-oriented stock; LAND is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GIPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; FCPT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.