Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PTNM vs HYMC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
PTNM vs HYMC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Gold |
| Market Cap | $208M | $3.55B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-77M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | 193.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $19M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $182M |
Quick Verdict: PTNM vs HYMC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTNM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 173.4% 10Y total return vs HYMC's -59.5%
- 9.9% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
- 11.9% margin vs HYMC's -2.5%
HYMC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth 64.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 23.86x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs HYMC's -2.5% | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.5% vs PTNM's +173.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.2% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 73.1% vs -90.1% |
PTNM vs HYMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTNM vs HYMC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PTNM and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $75M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$83M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$77M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$105M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -14.9% |
Valuation Metrics
HYMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208M | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 193.69x | -41.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 85.04x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.73x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 145.65x | 7.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-66 for HYMC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTNM scores 4/9 vs HYMC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | -65.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.2% | -33.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +73.1% | -90.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.5% | -22.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$182M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.66x | -9.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HYMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTNM five years ago would be worth $27,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,720 for HYMC. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1046.9% total return vs PTNM's +173.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 111.3% vs PTNM's 39.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +59.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.4% | +1046.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +843.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | -2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | -59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +111.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PTNM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTNM is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HYMC's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTNM currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs HYMC's 66.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.24x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.79 | $58.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +66.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 53.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
PTNM is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HYMC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). PTNM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).
PTNM vs HYMC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTNM or HYMC a better buy right now?
Pitanium Limited (PTNM) offers the better valuation at 193.
7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PTNM or HYMC?
Over the past 5 years, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) delivered a total return of +173.
4%, compared to -2. 8% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTNM returned +173. 4% versus HYMC's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PTNM or HYMC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation's 1. 21β — meaning HYMC is approximately -609% more volatile than PTNM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — PTNM or HYMC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation grew EPS 64.
3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 2% for Pitanium Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PTNM or HYMC?
Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTNM leads at 14. 7% versus 0. 0% for HYMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTNM leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PTNM or HYMC?
In this comparison, PTNM (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. HYMC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PTNM or HYMC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), +173. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTNM: +173. 4%, HYMC: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PTNM and HYMC?
These companies operate in different sectors (PTNM (Consumer Defensive) and HYMC (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.