Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PTNM vs TRX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
PTNM vs TRX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Gold |
| Market Cap | $208M | $355M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $98M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 47.1% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | 35.2% |
| Forward P/E | 193.7x | 70.3x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $15M |
Quick Verdict: PTNM vs TRX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTNM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 173.4% 10Y total return vs TRX's 164.5%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.24, current ratio 1.16x
- Beta -0.24, yield 0.4%, current ratio 1.16x
TRX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 41.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.4%
- 41.4% revenue growth vs PTNM's 9.9%
- Lower P/E (70.3x vs 193.7x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.4% revenue growth vs PTNM's 9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (70.3x vs 193.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs TRX's -6.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (3.8% vs 159.0%) | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +289.2% vs PTNM's +173.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.2% ROA vs TRX's -3.5%, ROIC 73.1% vs 15.5% |
PTNM vs TRX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — PTNM and TRX each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRX and PTNM operate at a comparable scale, with $98M and $75M in trailing revenue. PTNM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TRX's -6.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $98M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +47.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +35.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | -6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +103.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
Valuation Metrics
TRX leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TRX's 17.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTNM's 85.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208M | $355M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $348M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 193.69x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 70.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 85.04x | 17.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.73x | 6.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 145.65x | 3.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 187.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-6 for TRX. TRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTNM's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRX scores 5/9 vs PTNM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.2% | -3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +73.1% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$9M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.66x | 8.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTNM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTNM five years ago would be worth $27,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,964 for TRX. Over the past 12 months, TRX leads with a +289.2% total return vs PTNM's +173.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTNM at 39.8% vs TRX's 28.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +36.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.4% | +289.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +119.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +164.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
PTNM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTNM is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRX's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTNM currently trades 70.3% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 43.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.24x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.79 | $2.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $0.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +43.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 45.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
PTNM is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
PTNM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). TRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PTNM vs TRX: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTNM or TRX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is the stronger pick with 41.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 9% for Pitanium Limited (PTNM). Pitanium Limited (PTNM) offers the better valuation at 193. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — PTNM or TRX?
Over the past 5 years, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) delivered a total return of +173.
4%, compared to +119. 6% for TRX Gold Corporation (TRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTNM returned +173. 4% versus TRX's +164. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — PTNM or TRX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus TRX Gold Corporation's 1. 79β — meaning TRX is approximately -854% more volatile than PTNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 159% for Pitanium Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — PTNM or TRX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is pulling ahead at 41.
4% versus 9. 9% for Pitanium Limited (PTNM). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — PTNM or TRX?
Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
9% net margin versus 1. 2% for TRX Gold Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRX leads at 27. 5% versus 14. 7% for PTNM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTNM leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — PTNM or TRX?
In this comparison, PTNM (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TRX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is PTNM or TRX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), +173. 4% 10Y return). TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTNM: +173. 4%, TRX: +164. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between PTNM and TRX?
These companies operate in different sectors (PTNM (Consumer Defensive) and TRX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PTNM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.