Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Gold
Gold
Telecommunications Services
PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Industrial Materials | Gold | Gold | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $208M | $2.35B | $4.13B | $372M | $180M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $75M | $109M | $0.00 | $98M | $280M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-61M | $-77M | $-6M | $-77M |
| Gross Margin | 81.2% | 3.3% | — | 47.1% | 56.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.7% | -25.5% | — | 35.2% | 19.3% |
| Forward P/E | 193.7x | 30.9x | — | 73.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $19M | $24M | $0.00 | $5M | $4M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $20M | $182M | $15M | $27M |
PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Americas Gold and S… (USAS) | 100 | 114.4 | +14.4% |
| Hycroft Mining Hold… (HYMC) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) | 100 | 195.5 | +95.5% |
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTNM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 173.4% 10Y total return vs TRX's 156.1%
- 11.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
- 0.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 22.2% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 73.1% vs -90.1%
USAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (30.9x vs 73.3x)
HYMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.41
- Lower volatility, beta 1.41, current ratio 23.86x
- Beta 1.41, current ratio 23.86x
- Beta 1.41 vs USAS's 2.50
TRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 41.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.4%
- 41.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
Among these 5 stocks, KORE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.9x vs 73.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.41 vs USAS's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.4% vs PTNM's +173.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.2% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 73.1% vs -90.1% |
PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRX leads in 1 of 6 categories
KORE leads 1 • PTNM leads 1 • HYMC leads 1 • USAS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KORE and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $280M and $0 in trailing revenue. PTNM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, TRX holds the edge at +103.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $75M | $109M | $0 | $98M | $280M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$7M | -$83M | $40M | $108M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$61M | -$77M | -$6M | -$77M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$52M | -$105M | $6M | $16M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.2% | +3.3% | — | +47.1% | +56.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -25.5% | — | +35.2% | +19.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | -56.2% | — | -6.5% | -27.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -47.7% | — | +6.0% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +45.6% | — | +103.5% | -8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +55.3% | -14.9% | — | -85.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KORE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, KORE's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTNM's 85.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $208M | $2.3B | $4.1B | $372M | $180M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $208M | $2.4B | $3.9B | $365M | $157M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 193.69x | -17.60x | -48.04x | — | -2.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.93x | — | 73.30x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 85.04x | — | — | 18.48x | 1.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 21.73x | 23.44x | — | 6.43x | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 145.65x | 14.65x | 9.14x | 3.72x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 197.54x | 20.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTNM delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. TRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTNM's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRX scores 5/9 vs HYMC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +81.3% | -122.1% | -65.7% | -6.1% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +22.2% | -26.1% | -33.4% | -3.5% | -18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +73.1% | -26.3% | -90.1% | +15.5% | +44.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.5% | -21.6% | -22.8% | +15.3% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.59x | 0.45x | — | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $4M | -$182M | -$9M | -$23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $20M | $182M | $15M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $24M | $0 | $5M | $4M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.66x | -18.89x | -9.35x | 8.73x | -0.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HYMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTNM five years ago would be worth $27,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,252 for KORE. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1244.0% total return vs PTNM's +173.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 131.7% vs KORE's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +44.6% | +85.1% | +43.3% | +105.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +173.4% | +521.0% | +1244.0% | +318.7% | +306.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +631.7% | +1144.1% | +123.5% | +55.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +64.2% | +7.0% | +148.5% | -7.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.4% | +10.0% | -52.9% | +156.1% | -9.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.8% | +94.1% | +131.7% | +30.7% | +15.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PTNM and KORE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTNM is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 46.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.24x | 2.50x | 1.41x | 1.98x | -0.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.79 | $10.50 | $58.73 | $2.80 | $9.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $1.06 | $2.71 | $0.30 | $2.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.3% | +70.4% | +76.9% | +46.1% | +99.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.8 | 63.1 | 59.9 | 48.6 | 72.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 5.8M | 2.9M | 4.2M | 70K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: USAS as "Buy", HYMC as "Hold", TRX as "Buy", KORE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for TRX (target: $2) vs 31.9% for USAS (target: $10). PTNM is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.75 | — | $1.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
TRX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KORE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is the stronger pick with 41.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). Pitanium Limited (PTNM) offers the better valuation at 193. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?
On forward P/E, Americas Gold and Silver Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.
9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?
Over the past 5 years, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) delivered a total return of +173.
4%, compared to -7. 5% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTNM returned +173. 4% versus HYMC's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
24β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 50β — meaning USAS is approximately -1151% more volatile than PTNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 159% for Pitanium Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is pulling ahead at 41.
4% versus -0. 0% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation grew EPS 64. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 2% for Pitanium Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRX leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?
Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the more profitable company, earning 11.
9% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRX leads at 27. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTNM leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) trades at 30.
9x forward P/E versus 73. 3x for TRX Gold Corporation — 42. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRX: 45. 7% to $1. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?
In this comparison, PTNM (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. USAS, HYMC, TRX, KORE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
24), +173. 4% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTNM: +173. 4%, USAS: +10. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTNM and USAS and HYMC and TRX and KORE?
These companies operate in different sectors (PTNM (Consumer Defensive) and USAS (Basic Materials) and HYMC (Basic Materials) and TRX (Basic Materials) and KORE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: PTNM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.