Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
PTNM
Pitanium Limited

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$208M
5Y Perf.+22.3%
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+14.4%
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.13B
5Y Perf.-42.5%
TRX
TRX Gold Corporation

Gold

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$372M
5Y Perf.+95.5%
KORE
KORE Group Holdings, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$180M
5Y Perf.-10.4%

PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
PTNM logoPTNM
USAS logoUSAS
HYMC logoHYMC
TRX logoTRX
KORE logoKORE
IndustryHousehold & Personal ProductsIndustrial MaterialsGoldGoldTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$208M$2.35B$4.13B$372M$180M
Revenue (TTM)$75M$109M$0.00$98M$280M
Net Income (TTM)$9M$-61M$-77M$-6M$-77M
Gross Margin81.2%3.3%47.1%56.5%
Operating Margin14.7%-25.5%35.2%19.3%
Forward P/E193.7x30.9x73.3x
Total Debt$19M$24M$0.00$5M$4M
Cash & Equiv.$17M$20M$182M$15M$27M

PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

PTNM
USAS
HYMC
TRX
KORE
StockDec 20May 26Return
Americas Gold and S… (USAS)100114.4+14.4%
Hycroft Mining Hold… (HYMC)10057.5-42.5%
TRX Gold Corporation (TRX)100195.5+95.5%
KORE Group Holdings… (KORE)10089.6-10.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: PTNM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. USAS and TRX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
PTNM
Pitanium Limited
The Long-Run Compounder

PTNM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 173.4% 10Y total return vs TRX's 156.1%
  • 11.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
  • 0.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 22.2% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 73.1% vs -90.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
USAS
Americas Gold and Silver Corporation
The Value Play

USAS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (30.9x vs 73.3x)
Best for: value
HYMC
Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation
The Income Pick

HYMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.41
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.41, current ratio 23.86x
  • Beta 1.41, current ratio 23.86x
  • Beta 1.41 vs USAS's 2.50
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
TRX
TRX Gold Corporation
The Growth Play

TRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 41.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.4%
  • 41.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
Best for: growth exposure
KORE
KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
The Lower-Volatility Pick

Among these 5 stocks, KORE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTRX logoTRX41.4% revenue growth vs HYMC's -51.1%
ValueUSAS logoUSASLower P/E (30.9x vs 73.3x)
Quality / MarginsPTNM logoPTNM11.9% margin vs USAS's -56.2%
Stability / SafetyHYMC logoHYMCBeta 1.41 vs USAS's 2.50
DividendsPTNM logoPTNM0.4% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HYMC logoHYMC+12.4% vs PTNM's +173.4%
Efficiency (ROA)PTNM logoPTNM22.2% ROA vs HYMC's -33.4%, ROIC 73.1% vs -90.1%

PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

PTNMPitanium Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

USASAmericas Gold and Silver Corporation
FY 2023
Silver
49.0%$62M
Zinc
30.2%$38M
Lead
20.0%$25M
Other by-products
0.8%$1M
HYMCHycroft Mining Holding Corporation
FY 2022
Gold
97.1%$32M
Silver
2.9%$980,000
TRXTRX Gold Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

KOREKORE Group Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Service
79.5%$227M
Hardware Sales
20.5%$59M

PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLPTNMLAGGINGUSAS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

KORE and HYMC operate at a comparable scale, with $280M and $0 in trailing revenue. PTNM is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to USAS's -56.2%. On growth, TRX holds the edge at +103.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricPTNM logoPTNMPitanium LimitedUSAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…HYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…KORE logoKOREKORE Group Holdin…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$75M$109M$0$98M$280M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$7M-$83M$40M$108M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$61M-$77M-$6M-$77M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$52M-$105M$6M$16M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.2%+3.3%+47.1%+56.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+14.7%-25.5%+35.2%+19.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.9%-56.2%-6.5%-27.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.2%-47.7%+6.0%+5.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.6%+103.5%-8.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+55.3%-14.9%-85.7%
TRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

KORE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, KORE's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PTNM's 85.0x.

MetricPTNM logoPTNMPitanium LimitedUSAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…HYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…KORE logoKOREKORE Group Holdin…
Market CapShares × price$208M$2.3B$4.1B$372M$180M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$208M$2.4B$3.9B$365M$157M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS193.69x-17.60x-48.04x-2.87x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.30.93x73.30x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple85.04x18.48x1.60x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue21.73x23.44x6.43x0.63x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share145.65x14.65x9.14x3.72x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF197.54x20.86x
KORE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

PTNM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

PTNM delivers a 81.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $-122 for USAS. TRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PTNM's 1.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRX scores 5/9 vs HYMC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricPTNM logoPTNMPitanium LimitedUSAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…HYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…KORE logoKOREKORE Group Holdin…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+81.3%-122.1%-65.7%-6.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+22.2%-26.1%-33.4%-3.5%-18.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+73.1%-26.3%-90.1%+15.5%+44.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+74.5%-21.6%-22.8%+15.3%+11.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943255
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.59x0.45x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M$4M-$182M-$9M-$23M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$20M$182M$15M$27M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$19M$24M$0$5M$4M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.66x-18.89x-9.35x8.73x-0.21x
PTNM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HYMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in PTNM five years ago would be worth $27,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,252 for KORE. Over the past 12 months, HYMC leads with a +1244.0% total return vs PTNM's +173.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HYMC at 131.7% vs KORE's 15.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricPTNM logoPTNMPitanium LimitedUSAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…HYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…KORE logoKOREKORE Group Holdin…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date0.0%+44.6%+85.1%+43.3%+105.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+173.4%+521.0%+1244.0%+318.7%+306.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+173.4%+631.7%+1144.1%+123.5%+55.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+173.4%+64.2%+7.0%+148.5%-7.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+173.4%+10.0%-52.9%+156.1%-9.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+39.8%+94.1%+131.7%+30.7%+15.8%
HYMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PTNM and KORE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PTNM is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than USAS's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs TRX's 46.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricPTNM logoPTNMPitanium LimitedUSAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…HYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…KORE logoKOREKORE Group Holdin…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.24x2.50x1.41x1.98x-0.07x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.79$10.50$58.73$2.80$9.21
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.98$1.06$2.71$0.30$2.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+70.3%+70.4%+76.9%+46.1%+99.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.863.159.948.672.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded05.8M2.9M4.2M70K
Evenly matched — PTNM and KORE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: USAS as "Buy", HYMC as "Hold", TRX as "Buy", KORE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for TRX (target: $2) vs 31.9% for USAS (target: $10). PTNM is the only dividend payer here at 0.43% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricPTNM logoPTNMPitanium LimitedUSAS logoUSASAmericas Gold and…HYMC logoHYMCHycroft Mining Ho…TRX logoTRXTRX Gold Corporat…KORE logoKOREKORE Group Holdin…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.75$1.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts4119
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.35
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TRX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KORE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallPitanium Limited (PTNM)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

PTNM vs USAS vs HYMC vs TRX vs KORE: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is the stronger pick with 41.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 0% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). Pitanium Limited (PTNM) offers the better valuation at 193. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?

On forward P/E, Americas Gold and Silver Corporation is actually cheaper at 30.

9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?

Over the past 5 years, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) delivered a total return of +173.

4%, compared to -7. 5% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTNM returned +173. 4% versus HYMC's -52. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus Americas Gold and Silver Corporation's 2. 50β — meaning USAS is approximately -1151% more volatile than PTNM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 159% for Pitanium Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TRX Gold Corporation (TRX) is pulling ahead at 41.

4% versus -0. 0% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation grew EPS 64. 3% year-over-year, compared to -19. 2% for Pitanium Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRX leads at 60. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?

Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the more profitable company, earning 11.

9% net margin versus -44. 9% for Americas Gold and Silver Corporation — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRX leads at 27. 5% versus -26. 2% for USAS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTNM leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) trades at 30.

9x forward P/E versus 73. 3x for TRX Gold Corporation — 42. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRX: 45. 7% to $1. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE?

In this comparison, PTNM (0.

4% yield) pays a dividend. USAS, HYMC, TRX, KORE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is PTNM or USAS or HYMC or TRX or KORE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pitanium Limited (PTNM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), +173. 4% 10Y return). Americas Gold and Silver Corporation (USAS) carries a higher beta of 2. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTNM: +173. 4%, USAS: +10. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between PTNM and USAS and HYMC and TRX and KORE?

These companies operate in different sectors (PTNM (Consumer Defensive) and USAS (Basic Materials) and HYMC (Basic Materials) and TRX (Basic Materials) and KORE (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: PTNM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; USAS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

PTNM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

USAS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HYMC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TRX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 51%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KORE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform PTNM and USAS and HYMC and TRX and KORE on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(PTNM: 9.9% · USAS: 45.6%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.