Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Medical - Distribution
PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Medical - Distribution |
| Market Cap | $56K | $1690.08T | $1.62B | $5.83B | $90.21B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $725K | $0.00 | $4.18B | $1.56B | $403.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-168M | $-1.82B | $153M | $4.76B |
| Gross Margin | 63.5% | — | 34.2% | 65.4% | 3.6% |
| Operating Margin | -18.4% | — | -4.1% | 12.3% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 5.5x | 24.5x | 16.7x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $22M | $3.97B | $70M | $8.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M | $532M | $1.12B | $3.98B |
PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Petros Pharmaceutic… (PTPI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 75.3 | -24.7% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 26.2 | -73.8% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| McKesson Corporation (MCK) | 100 | 423.5 | +323.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PTPI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.5% vs PTPI's -94.4%
PRGO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.21, yield 9.8%
- Beta 1.21, yield 9.8%, current ratio 2.76x
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 16.7x)
ALKS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- 9.8% margin vs PTPI's -9.7%
- Beta 1.00 vs PTPI's 1.45
MCK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth 49.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- 339.0% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -12.0%
- 12.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- 5.7% ROA vs PTPI's -114.5%, ROIC 74.5% vs -7.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 16.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs PTPI's -9.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs PTPI's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MCK's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs PTPI's -94.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs PTPI's -114.5%, ROIC 74.5% vs -7.3% |
PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCK leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 1 • PRGO leads 1 • PTPI leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCK and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $403.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PTPI's -9.7%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $725,403 | $0 | $4.2B | $1.6B | $403.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$112M | $58M | $212M | $6.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$168M | -$1.8B | $153M | $4.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$151M | $108M | $392M | $6.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.5% | — | +34.2% | +65.4% | +3.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | — | -4.1% | +12.3% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.7% | — | -43.5% | +9.8% | +1.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.7% | — | +2.6% | +25.1% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | -7.2% | +28.2% | +6.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +91.5% | -56.4% | -4.1% | +37.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.2x trailing earnings, MCK trades at a 22% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRGO's 7.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALKS's 17.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56,182 | $1690.08T | $1.6B | $5.8B | $90.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1690.08T | $5.1B | $4.8B | $94.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.75x | -1.14x | 24.47x | 19.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 5.53x | — | 16.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 7.43x | 17.01x | 15.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | — | 0.38x | 3.95x | 0.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.65x | 0.55x | 3.25x | 11.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.17x | 12.14x | 14.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MCK delivers a 3.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PTPI. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs PTPI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | -130.2% | -50.7% | +8.8% | +3.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.5% | -89.0% | -19.8% | +5.4% | +5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | — | +3.7% | +18.9% | +74.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.3% | -145.7% | +4.3% | +14.2% | +43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.13x | 1.35x | 0.04x | 1.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | -$172M | $3.4B | -$1.0B | $4.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M | $532M | $1.1B | $4.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $22M | $4.0B | $70M | $8.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -79.35x | -189.82x | -7.20x | 32.30x | 33.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MCK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCK five years ago would be worth $37,043 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for PTPI. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs PTPI's -94.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MCK at 26.4% vs PTPI's -95.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.5% | +3.6% | -13.6% | +23.8% | -10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.4% | +100.5% | -52.0% | +15.2% | +7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +18.1% | -58.1% | +13.2% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -68.3% | -60.3% | +61.7% | +270.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -87.1% | -77.7% | -12.0% | +339.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -95.9% | +5.7% | -25.2% | +4.2% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALKS and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCK is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PTPI's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs PTPI's 3.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.45x | 1.26x | 1.21x | 1.00x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.21 | $26.18 | $28.44 | $36.60 | $999.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $7.53 | $9.23 | $25.17 | $637.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.3% | +75.3% | +41.2% | +95.6% | +73.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.2 | 47.4 | 53.1 | 60.5 | 21.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 252K | 3.3M | 2.2M | 782K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PTPI and MCK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", ALKS as "Buy", MCK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 31.5% for ALKS (target: $46). For income investors, PTPI offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MCK's 0.42%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $36.20 | $46.00 | $994.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 36 | 28 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | — | +9.8% | — | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $161.09 | — | $1.15 | — | $3.07 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
MCK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALKS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
PTPI vs DBVT vs PRGO vs ALKS vs MCK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger pick with 12.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 2% for Petros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PTPI). McKesson Corporation (MCK) offers the better valuation at 19. 2x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK?
On trailing P/E, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the cheapest at 19.
2x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK?
Over the past 5 years, McKesson Corporation (MCK) delivered a total return of +270.
4%, compared to -100. 0% for Petros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PTPI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCK returned +339. 0% versus PTPI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Petros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning PTPI is approximately -8948% more volatile than MCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), McKesson Corporation (MCK) is pulling ahead at 12.
4% versus -12. 2% for Petros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (PTPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McKesson Corporation grew EPS 49. 2% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, MCK leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -280. 1% for Petros Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -345. 8% for PTPI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for McKesson Corporation — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK?
In this comparison, PTPI (100.
0% yield), PRGO (9. 8% yield), MCK (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PTPI or DBVT or PRGO or ALKS or MCK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McKesson Corporation (MCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), +339. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCK: +339. 0%, DBVT: -87. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PTPI and DBVT and PRGO and ALKS and MCK?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PTPI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PTPI, PRGO pay a dividend while DBVT, ALKS, MCK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.