PUMP vs RES

For growth investors, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the stronger pick with 15. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). RPC, Inc. (RES) offers the better valuation at 49. 2x trailing P/E (35. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the cheapest at 49. 2x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, ProPetro Holding Corp.

(PUMP) delivered a total return of +50. 8%, compared to +43. 1% for RPC, Inc. (RES). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PUMP returned +8. 8% versus RES's -35. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus ProPetro Holding Corp. 's 1. 12β — meaning PUMP is approximately 108% more volatile than RES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RPC, Inc. (RES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 30% for ProPetro Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), RPC, Inc.

(RES) is pulling ahead at 15. 0% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -65. 1% for RPC, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RES leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus 0. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RES leads at 3. 5% versus 1. 5% for PUMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RES leads at 14. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PUMP: -6.

5% to $14. 75.

In this comparison, RES (2.

2% yield) pays a dividend. PUMP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, RPC, Inc.

(RES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 2. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RES: -35. 7%, PUMP: +8. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

RES pays a dividend while PUMP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.