Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
PVBC vs DCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
PVBC vs DCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $240M | $1.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $730M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $111M |
| Gross Margin | 57.6% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 21.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $371M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169M | $2.35B |
PVBC vs DCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Nov 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Provident Bancorp, … (PVBC) | 100 | 158.5 | +58.5% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 123.2 | +23.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PVBC vs DCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PVBC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.43
- 100.3% 10Y total return vs DCOM's 68.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 21.0%, current ratio 0.13x
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PVBC's -2.0%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 20.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs PVBC's -2.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 20.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PVBC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs DCOM's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.6% vs PVBC's +20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PVBC's 0.5% |
PVBC vs DCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PVBC vs DCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $730M annually — 7.8x PVBC's $94M. DCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 15.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PVBC's 7.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $730M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $18M | $161M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $111M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $182M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +21.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +25.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, DCOM trades at a 50% valuation discount to PVBC's 31.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $240M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $119M | -$341M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.40x | 15.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.77x | 10.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.47x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.42x | -2.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.98x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.83x | 9.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DCOM delivers a 7.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $5 for PVBC. PVBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DCOM's 0.25x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs PVBC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.3% | +7.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.8% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$121M | -$2.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169M | $2.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $371M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DCOM five years ago would be worth $12,266 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,263 for PVBC. Over the past 12 months, DCOM leads with a +46.6% total return vs PVBC's +20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DCOM at 31.8% vs PVBC's 24.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | +46.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.5% | +129.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | +22.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.3% | +68.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | +31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — PVBC and DCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PVBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.43x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.75 | $37.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.94 | $24.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.7 | 60.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 396K | 271K |
Analyst Outlook
DCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates PVBC as "Hold" and DCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for DCOM (target: $40) vs -11.1% for PVBC (target: $12). DCOM is the only dividend payer here at 2.68% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.00 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
DCOM leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
PVBC vs DCOM: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PVBC or DCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC). Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PVBC or DCOM?
On trailing P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus Provident Bancorp, Inc. at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PVBC or DCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) delivered a total return of +22. 7%, compared to -17. 4% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PVBC returned +100. 3% versus DCOM's +68. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PVBC or DCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Bancorp, Inc.
(PVBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 142% more volatile than PVBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 25% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PVBC or DCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -2. 0% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -34. 8% for Provident Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PVBC or DCOM?
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 7. 7% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DCOM leads at 21. 5% versus 10. 0% for PVBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PVBC leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PVBC or DCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Provident Bancorp, Inc. — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DCOM: 6. 0% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PVBC or DCOM?
In this comparison, DCOM (2.
7% yield) pays a dividend. PVBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PVBC or DCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Provident Bancorp, Inc.
(PVBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), +100. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PVBC: +100. 3%, DCOM: +68. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PVBC and DCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PVBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock. DCOM pays a dividend while PVBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.