PVBC vs NECB

For growth investors, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) is the stronger pick with -1. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus Provident Bancorp, Inc. at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x.

Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -17. 4% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +460. 8% versus PVBC's +100. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Provident Bancorp, Inc.

(PVBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 0. 83β — meaning NECB is approximately 92% more volatile than PVBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 21% for Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) is pulling ahead at -1. 6% versus -2. 0% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. (PVBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS -7. 7% year-over-year, compared to -34. 8% for Provident Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus 7. 7% for Provident Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus 10. 0% for PVBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NECB leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 8x for Provident Bancorp, Inc. — 13. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

In this comparison, NECB (4.

0% yield) pays a dividend. PVBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.

(NECB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 4. 0% yield, +460. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NECB: +460. 8%, PVBC: +100. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: PVBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock. NECB pays a dividend while PVBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.