Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $106M | $1.71B | $6.75B | $116.17B | $9.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14M | $66M | $0.00 | $48.48B | $4.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $-423M | $-506M | $7.28B | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 99.8% | 82.1% | — | 68.7% | 31.9% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -7.2% | — | 25.7% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 9.0x | 17.0x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $62M | $72K | $47.14B | $3.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $15M | $89M | $902M | $10.21B | $214M |
PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| Agios Pharmaceutica… (AGIO) | 100 | 61.1 | -38.9% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 409.0 | +309.0% |
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 97.4 | -2.6% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 41.9 | -58.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
PYXS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AGIO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 48.0%, EPS growth -161.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 11.46x
- Beta 1.05, current ratio 11.46x
- 48.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
IMVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 230.5% 10Y total return vs CRL's 123.0%
- +103.6% vs AGIO's -16.5%
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 4.3%
- Lower P/E (9.0x vs 17.0x)
- 15.0% margin vs AGIO's -6.4%
- Beta 0.33 vs IMVT's 1.67
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 48.0% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.0x vs 17.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs AGIO's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs IMVT's 1.67 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.6% vs AGIO's -16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs PYXS's -85.0%, ROIC 16.9% vs -71.1% |
PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BMY leads in 4 of 6 categories
IMVT leads 1 • PYXS leads 0 • AGIO leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $48.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. BMY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGIO's -6.4%. On growth, AGIO holds the edge at +137.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14M | $66M | $0 | $48.5B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$81M | -$470M | -$532M | $15.7B | $824M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | -$423M | -$506M | $7.3B | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$67M | -$385M | -$407M | $11.9B | $391M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.8% | +82.1% | — | +68.7% | +31.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -7.2% | — | +25.7% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.9% | -6.4% | — | +15.0% | -4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | -5.8% | — | +24.6% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +137.7% | — | +2.6% | +1.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.7% | -9.0% | -14.1% | +9.2% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BMY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRL's 13.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $1.7B | $6.8B | $116.2B | $9.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $109M | $1.7B | $5.8B | $153.1B | $11.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.30x | -4.03x | -11.87x | 16.49x | -64.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 9.01x | 16.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 9.25x | 13.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.63x | 31.61x | — | 2.41x | 2.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.94x | 1.40x | 7.04x | 6.28x | 2.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 9.04x | 17.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-136 for PYXS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -135.6% | -34.1% | -68.2% | +39.0% | -5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -85.0% | -31.7% | -62.2% | +7.9% | -2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -71.1% | -26.3% | — | +16.9% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -80.4% | -33.8% | -68.3% | +18.7% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.05x | 0.00x | 2.55x | 0.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$27M | -$902M | $36.9B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $15M | $89M | $902M | $10.2B | $214M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $62M | $72,000 | $47.1B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 10.33x | 4.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $30,700 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,265 for PYXS. Over the past 12 months, IMVT leads with a +103.6% total return vs AGIO's -16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.9% vs PYXS's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.2% | +5.7% | +26.9% | +8.8% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.5% | -16.5% | +103.6% | +18.4% | +24.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.7% | +10.1% | +51.6% | -0.9% | -8.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -50.3% | +207.0% | +1.7% | -46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.3% | -44.7% | +230.5% | +6.3% | +123.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.9% | +3.3% | +14.9% | -0.3% | -2.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMVT and BMY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IMVT's 1.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs PYXS's 30.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.50x | 1.05x | 1.67x | 0.33x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.55 | $46.00 | $36.27 | $62.89 | $228.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.97 | $22.24 | $14.32 | $42.52 | $143.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +30.1% | +62.4% | +90.6% | +90.5% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 52.4 | 51.9 | 44.0 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 528K | 1.0M | 1.9M | 9.0M | 769K |
Analyst Outlook
BMY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PYXS as "Buy", AGIO as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", BMY as "Hold", CRL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 229.3% upside for PYXS (target: $6) vs 8.5% for BMY (target: $62). BMY is the only dividend payer here at 4.34% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.50 | $42.00 | $43.67 | $61.73 | $213.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 29 | 23 | 41 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% |
BMY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
PYXS vs AGIO vs IMVT vs BMY vs CRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is the stronger pick with 48. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 2% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
On forward P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company is actually cheaper at 9.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +207. 0%, compared to -87. 3% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +230. 5% versus PYXS's -87. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus Immunovant, Inc. 's 1. 67β — meaning IMVT is approximately 410% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(AGIO) is pulling ahead at 48. 0% versus -14. 2% for Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGIO leads at 56. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -764. 0% for Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMY leads at 26. 3% versus -873. 9% for AGIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PYXS leads at 82. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) trades at 9.
0x forward P/E versus 17. 0x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PYXS: 229. 3% to $5. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL?
In this comparison, BMY (4.
3% yield) pays a dividend. PYXS, AGIO, IMVT, CRL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is PYXS or AGIO or IMVT or BMY or CRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
33), 4. 3% yield). Pyxis Oncology, Inc. (PYXS) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMY: +6. 3%, PYXS: -87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between PYXS and AGIO and IMVT and BMY and CRL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: PYXS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. BMY pays a dividend while PYXS, AGIO, IMVT, CRL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.