Drug Manufacturers - General
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
BMY vs PFE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
BMY vs PFE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $116.22B | $150.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48.48B | $63.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.28B | $7.49B |
| Gross Margin | 68.7% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | 25.7% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.0x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $47.14B | $67.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.21B | $1.14B |
BMY vs PFE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squib… (BMY) | 100 | 95.3 | -4.7% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BMY vs PFE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BMY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -0.2%, EPS growth 178.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, current ratio 1.26x
- Beta 0.50, yield 4.3%, current ratio 1.26x
PFE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- 30.5% 10Y total return vs BMY's 8.0%
- Lower P/E (8.9x vs 9.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.2% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 9.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs PFE's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.50 vs PFE's 0.54 | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs BMY's 4.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +18.7% vs PFE's +18.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.9% ROA vs PFE's 3.6%, ROIC 16.9% vs 7.5% |
BMY vs PFE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BMY vs PFE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BMY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PFE and BMY operate at a comparable scale, with $63.3B and $48.5B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.0% (BMY) to 11.8% (PFE).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48.5B | $63.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15.7B | $21.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.3B | $7.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11.9B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.7% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +11.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BMY and PFE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, BMY trades at a 15% valuation discount to PFE's 19.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BMY's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PFE's 10.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $116.2B | $150.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $153.1B | $216.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.50x | 19.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.04x | 8.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.25x | 10.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.28x | 1.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.05x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BMY delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $8 for PFE. PFE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.78x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BMY's 2.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BMY scores 8/9 vs PFE's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.0% | +8.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.7% | +9.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.55x | 0.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36.9B | $66.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.2B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $47.1B | $67.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 10.33x | 4.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BMY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BMY five years ago would be worth $10,588 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,677 for PFE. Over the past 12 months, BMY leads with a +18.7% total return vs PFE's +18.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BMY at -2.0% vs PFE's -6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.8% | +6.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | +18.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.8% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.9% | -13.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.0% | +30.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.0% | -6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BMY and PFE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BMY is the less volatile stock with a 0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFE's 0.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.89 | $28.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.52 | $21.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.5% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.5M | 33.1M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BMY as "Hold" and PFE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for BMY (target: $62) vs 3.1% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.50% vs BMY's 4.34%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $62.00 | $27.27 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 41 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +6.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $1.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BMY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PFE leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
BMY vs PFE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BMY or PFE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger pick with -0.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) a "Hold" — based on 41 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BMY or PFE?
On trailing P/E, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the cheapest at 16.
5x versus Pfizer Inc. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BMY or PFE?
Over the past 5 years, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) delivered a total return of +5.
9%, compared to -13. 2% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFE returned +30. 5% versus BMY's +8. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BMY or PFE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
50β versus Pfizer Inc. 's 0. 54β — meaning PFE is approximately 8% more volatile than BMY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pfizer Inc. (PFE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 78% versus 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BMY or PFE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is pulling ahead at -0.
2% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company grew EPS 178. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for Pfizer Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BMY leads at 1. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BMY or PFE?
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus 12. 4% for Pfizer Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BMY leads at 26. 3% versus 24. 7% for PFE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PFE leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BMY or PFE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc.
(PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BMY: 8. 9% to $62. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BMY or PFE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pfizer Inc. (PFE) offers the highest yield at 6. 5%, versus 4. 3% for Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY).
09Is BMY or PFE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BMY: +8. 0%, PFE: +30. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BMY and PFE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BMY is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.