Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $161M | $1.60B | $706M | $1.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $287M | $1.84B | $1.06B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $59M | $-3M | $100M |
| Gross Margin | 84.5% | 13.3% | 34.5% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | 3.0% | 7.2% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.8x | 22.8x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $119M | $25M | $500M | $209M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $161M | $44M | $82M |
QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 22 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quipt Home Medical … (QIPT) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
| Healthcare Services… (HCSG) | 100 | 125.0 | +25.0% |
| Enhabit, Inc. (EHAB) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| Addus HomeCare Corp… (ADUS) | 100 | 124.3 | +24.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QIPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +70.6% vs ADUS's -13.4%
HCSG is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 7.3% ROA vs QIPT's -5.3%, ROIC 9.0% vs -1.4%
EHAB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 88.6%, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.44, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 0.44 vs HCSG's 1.12
ADUS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.58
- Rev growth 23.2%, EPS growth 23.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.4%
- 399.9% 10Y total return vs HCSG's -26.8%
- 23.2% revenue growth vs QIPT's -0.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 23.2% revenue growth vs QIPT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs QIPT's -3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs HCSG's 1.12 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +70.6% vs ADUS's -13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.3% ROA vs QIPT's -5.3%, ROIC 9.0% vs -1.4% |
QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QIPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
HCSG leads 2 • ADUS leads 1 • EHAB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADUS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 6.4x QIPT's $287M. ADUS is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QIPT's -3.7%. On growth, QIPT holds the edge at +34.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $287M | $1.8B | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $46M | $72M | $98M | $159M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | $59M | -$3M | $100M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | $139M | $81M | $137M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.5% | +13.3% | +34.5% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | +3.0% | +7.2% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +3.2% | -0.3% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +7.6% | +7.6% | +9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.0% | +6.6% | +1.9% | +7.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +175.0% | +2.9% | +17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
QIPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, ADUS trades at a 32% valuation discount to HCSG's 27.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QIPT's 6.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HCSG's 22.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $1.6B | $706M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $267M | $1.5B | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.60x | 27.54x | -152.10x | 18.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.83x | 22.84x | 14.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.37x | 22.38x | 13.47x | 12.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.87x | 0.67x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 3.19x | 1.24x | 1.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.34x | 11.49x | 10.73x | 17.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCSG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCSG delivers a 11.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-10 for QIPT. HCSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QIPT's 1.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCSG scores 7/9 vs QIPT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.5% | +11.8% | -0.6% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.3% | +7.3% | -0.3% | +7.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.4% | +9.0% | +4.5% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | +7.7% | +6.0% | +10.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.06x | 0.05x | 0.89x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | -$136M | $456M | $127M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $161M | $44M | $82M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $119M | $25M | $500M | $209M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.30x | 33.02x | 0.83x | 14.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — HCSG and ADUS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADUS five years ago would be worth $10,002 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,497 for QIPT. Over the past 12 months, QIPT leads with a +70.6% total return vs ADUS's -13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCSG at 14.1% vs QIPT's -16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.4% | +28.6% | +51.6% | -8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.6% | +55.8% | +68.0% | -13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | +48.6% | +2.1% | +16.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | -21.1% | -44.9% | +0.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +351.7% | -26.8% | -44.9% | +399.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.1% | +14.1% | +0.7% | +5.2% |
Risk & Volatility
QIPT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QIPT is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HCSG's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QIPT currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ADUS's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.03x | 1.12x | 0.44x | 0.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.65 | $24.39 | $14.22 | $124.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.35 | $12.66 | $6.47 | $90.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +91.5% | +96.9% | +78.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.6 | 61.8 | 58.6 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 594K | 676K | 1.3M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
HCSG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: QIPT as "Buy", HCSG as "Hold", EHAB as "Hold", ADUS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.3% upside for ADUS (target: $129) vs -1.8% for EHAB (target: $14).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.65 | $24.50 | $13.53 | $128.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 20 | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
QIPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). HCSG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
QIPT vs HCSG vs EHAB vs ADUS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the stronger pick with 23.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT). Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS?
On trailing P/E, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the cheapest at 18.
7x versus Healthcare Services Group, Inc. at 27. 5x. On forward P/E, Addus HomeCare Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS?
Over the past 5 years, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) delivered a total return of +0.
0%, compared to -45. 0% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADUS returned +399. 9% versus EHAB's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quipt Home Medical Corp.
(QIPT) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Healthcare Services Group, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning HCSG is approximately -3328% more volatile than QIPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 106% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is pulling ahead at 23.
2% versus -0. 2% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. (QIPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Enhabit, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to -56. 3% for Quipt Home Medical Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QIPT leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS?
Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
7% net margin versus -4. 4% for Quipt Home Medical Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADUS leads at 9. 7% versus -1. 6% for QIPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QIPT leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) trades at 14.
1x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Enhabit, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADUS: 32. 3% to $128. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is QIPT or HCSG or EHAB or ADUS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quipt Home Medical Corp.
(QIPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), +351. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QIPT: +351. 7%, HCSG: -26. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QIPT and HCSG and EHAB and ADUS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QIPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCSG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EHAB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ADUS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare HCSG vs AMSF
AMSF is one of the most direct listed alternatives to HCSG.
Compare EHAB vs ENSG
ENSG overlaps with EHAB in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Add ENSG to This Comparison
ENSG is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.