QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
QNTM vs CMPS vs MNMD vs SAVA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CMPS
COMPASS Pathways plc
Medical - Care Facilities
Market Cap$952M
5Y Perf.-71.6%
MNMD
Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$2.04B
5Y Perf.+111.0%
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
Biotechnology
Market Cap$94M
5Y Perf.+39.0%
QNTM vs CMPS vs MNMD vs SAVA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | QNTM | CMPS | MNMD | SAVA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Care Facilities | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $22M | $952M | $2.04B | $94M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-31M | $-288M | $-238M | $-106M |
| Total Debt | $2M | $21M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $150M | $258M | $129M |
QNTM vs CMPS vs MNMD vs SAVA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
QNTM
CMPS
MNMD
SAVA
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quantum BioPharma L… (QNTM) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) | 100 | 28.4 | -71.6% |
| Mind Medicine (Mind… (MNMD) | 100 | 211.0 | +111.0% |
| Cassava Sciences, I… (SAVA) | 100 | 139.0 | +39.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QNTM vs CMPS vs MNMD vs SAVA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: QNTM and MNMD are tied at the top with 2 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SAVA also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
The Income Pick
QNTM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.97
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 36.8%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.97, current ratio 1.07x
- -49.3% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4%
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CMPS
COMPASS Pathways plc
The Secondary Option
CMPS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: healthcare exposure
MNMD
Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
MNMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs SAVA's -19.5%
- +220.3% vs QNTM's -44.2%
- -70.7% ROA vs QNTM's -222.9%, ROIC -389.5% vs -222.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
SAVA
Cassava Sciences, Inc.
The Growth Play
SAVA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 77.6%
- 5.4% margin vs QNTM's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | QNTM | -49.3% revenue growth vs SAVA's -5.4% |
| Quality / Margins | SAVA | 5.4% margin vs QNTM's -3.4% |
| Stability / Safety | QNTM | Beta 0.97 vs SAVA's 1.99 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MNMD | +220.3% vs QNTM's -44.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MNMD | -70.7% ROA vs QNTM's -222.9%, ROIC -389.5% vs -222.1% |
QNTM vs CMPS vs MNMD vs SAVA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMNMDLAGGINGCMPS
Who Leads Where
MNMD leads in 2 of 6 categories
SAVA leads 1 • QNTM leads 0 • CMPS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓CMPSCOMPASS Pathways plc
0leads
QNTMQuantum BioPharma Ltd.
0leads
SAVACassava Sciences, Inc.
1leads
MNMDMind Medicine (MindMe…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SAVAvs QNTMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SAVA1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MNMD6/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MNMD6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QNTM and SAVA operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | QNTMQuantum BioPharma… | CMPSCOMPASS Pathways … | MNMDMind Medicine (Mi… | SAVACassava Sciences,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$179M | -$191M | -$110M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$31M | -$288M | -$238M | -$106M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | -$157M | -$174M | -$84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +60.4% | -58.7% | -163.0% | +62.1% |
SAVA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MNMD and SAVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | QNTMQuantum BioPharma… | CMPSCOMPASS Pathways … | MNMDMind Medicine (Mi… | SAVACassava Sciences,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22M | $952M | $2.0B | $94M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22M | $824M | $1.8B | -$34M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.60x | -3.22x | -10.04x | -3.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.15x | — | 5.56x | 0.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Evenly matched — MNMD and SAVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SAVA delivers a -95.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-96 in annual profit, vs $-9 for QNTM. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNMD scores 3/9 vs QNTM's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | QNTMQuantum BioPharma… | CMPSCOMPASS Pathways … | MNMDMind Medicine (Mi… | SAVACassava Sciences,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | -3.4% | -102.5% | -95.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | -106.8% | -70.7% | -75.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.2% | — | -3.9% | -6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -197.0% | -2.5% | -52.2% | -99.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | — | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29,093 | -$129M | -$258M | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $150M | $258M | $129M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $21M | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -54.04x | -52.40x | -21.81x | — |
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNMD five years ago would be worth $4,493 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $475 for QNTM. Over the past 12 months, MNMD leads with a +220.3% total return vs QNTM's -44.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNMD at 82.7% vs QNTM's -60.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | QNTMQuantum BioPharma… | CMPSCOMPASS Pathways … | MNMDMind Medicine (Mi… | SAVACassava Sciences,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.4% | +51.3% | +51.7% | -6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.2% | +163.6% | +220.3% | +15.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | +17.1% | +510.3% | -40.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.2% | -72.3% | -55.1% | -64.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | -65.8% | +512.1% | -19.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -60.5% | +5.4% | +82.7% | -16.0% |
MNMD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QNTM and MNMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QNTM is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAVA's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNMD currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs QNTM's 12.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | QNTMQuantum BioPharma… | CMPSCOMPASS Pathways … | MNMDMind Medicine (Mi… | SAVACassava Sciences,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 1.28x | 1.63x | 1.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $38.25 | $10.21 | $21.09 | $4.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.07 | $2.25 | $6.03 | $1.54 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +12.8% | +97.1% | +98.1% | +39.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.4 | 63.4 | 64.9 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 496K | 3.6M | 779K | 727K |
Evenly matched — QNTM and MNMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMPS as "Buy", MNMD as "Buy", SAVA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.6% upside for CMPS (target: $18) vs -3.3% for MNMD (target: $20).
| Metric | QNTMQuantum BioPharma… | CMPSCOMPASS Pathways … | MNMDMind Medicine (Mi… | SAVACassava Sciences,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $20.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MNMD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SAVA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallMind Medicine (MindMed) Inc. (MNMD)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
QNTM vs CMPS vs MNMD vs SAVA: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate COMPASS Pathways plc (CMPS) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA?
Over the past 5 years, Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.
(MNMD) delivered a total return of -55. 1%, compared to -95. 2% for Quantum BioPharma Ltd. (QNTM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNMD returned +512. 1% versus QNTM's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
(QNTM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 97β versus Cassava Sciences, Inc. 's 1. 99β — meaning SAVA is approximately 105% more volatile than QNTM relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cassava Sciences, Inc.
grew EPS 77. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1273. 3% for Mind Medicine (MindMed) Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA?
Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
(QNTM) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Cassava Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QNTM leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for SAVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QNTM leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is QNTM or CMPS or MNMD or SAVA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quantum BioPharma Ltd.
(QNTM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 97)). Cassava Sciences, Inc. (SAVA) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QNTM: -99. 6%, SAVA: -19. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between QNTM and CMPS and MNMD and SAVA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.