QRHC vs CLH

For growth investors, Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (33. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) delivered a total return of +198. 8%, compared to -69. 6% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLH returned +496. 4% versus QRHC's -66. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Quest Resource Holding Corporation's 1. 21β — meaning QRHC is approximately 72% more volatile than CLH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 126% versus 160% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus -13. 3% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Quest Resource Holding Corporation grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1. 9% for Clean Harbors, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLH leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -6. 1% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLH leads at 11. 2% versus -0. 1% for QRHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLH leads at 29. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Clean Harbors, Inc.

(CLH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70), +496. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLH: +496. 4%, QRHC: -66. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.