Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QRHC vs NVRI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
QRHC vs NVRI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $23M | $1.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $250M | $2.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $-171M |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 19.2% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 1.0% |
| Total Debt | $65M | $1.81B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $104M |
QRHC vs NVRI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quest Resource Hold… (QRHC) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Enviri Corporation (NVRI) | 100 | 172.1 | +72.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QRHC vs NVRI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QRHC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 1.30x
- -6.1% margin vs NVRI's -7.6%
NVRI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth -4.3%, EPS growth -30.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- 191.4% 10Y total return vs QRHC's -66.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.3% revenue growth vs QRHC's -13.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.1% margin vs NVRI's -7.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs QRHC's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +170.5% vs QRHC's -54.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -6.2% ROA vs QRHC's -10.0%, ROIC 3.3% vs -0.2% |
QRHC vs NVRI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QRHC vs NVRI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — QRHC and NVRI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVRI is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 9.0x QRHC's $250M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -6.1% (QRHC) to -7.6% (NVRI). On growth, NVRI holds the edge at -0.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $250M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$361,000 | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | -$171M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | -$40M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +19.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | -7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.8% | -0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.9% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — QRHC and NVRI each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, NVRI's 12.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QRHC's 17.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $87M | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.48x | -9.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.64x | 12.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 5.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
QRHC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QRHC delivers a -36.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-36 in annual profit, vs $-44 for NVRI. QRHC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVRI's 6.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QRHC scores 4/9 vs NVRI's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.2% | -43.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.0% | -6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.60x | 6.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $64M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.02x | -0.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVRI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVRI five years ago would be worth $8,517 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,042 for QRHC. Over the past 12 months, NVRI leads with a +170.5% total return vs QRHC's -54.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVRI at 27.1% vs QRHC's -41.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.5% | +7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.8% | +170.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +105.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | -14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | +191.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.7% | +27.1% |
Risk & Volatility
NVRI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVRI is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QRHC's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVRI currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs QRHC's 40.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.64 | $19.98 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $6.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.9% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NVRI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). QRHC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
QRHC vs NVRI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QRHC or NVRI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enviri Corporation (NVRI) is the stronger pick with -4.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Analysts rate Enviri Corporation (NVRI) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QRHC or NVRI?
Over the past 5 years, Enviri Corporation (NVRI) delivered a total return of -14.
8%, compared to -69. 6% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVRI returned +191. 4% versus QRHC's -66. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QRHC or NVRI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enviri Corporation (NVRI) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
18β versus Quest Resource Holding Corporation's 1. 21β — meaning QRHC is approximately 2% more volatile than NVRI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 160% versus 6% for Enviri Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — QRHC or NVRI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enviri Corporation (NVRI) is pulling ahead at -4.
3% versus -13. 3% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Quest Resource Holding Corporation grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 0% for Enviri Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVRI leads at 1. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QRHC or NVRI?
Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC) is the more profitable company, earning -6.
1% net margin versus -7. 5% for Enviri Corporation — meaning it keeps -6. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVRI leads at 3. 9% versus -0. 1% for QRHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVRI leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — QRHC or NVRI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is QRHC or NVRI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enviri Corporation (NVRI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
18), +191. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NVRI: +191. 4%, QRHC: -66. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between QRHC and NVRI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.