Waste Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QRHC vs RSG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
QRHC vs RSG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $23M | $62.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $250M | $16.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $2.17B |
| Gross Margin | 14.9% | 22.8% |
| Operating Margin | -2.6% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.8x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $596M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $76M |
QRHC vs RSG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quest Resource Hold… (QRHC) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Republic Services, … (RSG) | 100 | 235.9 | +135.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QRHC vs RSG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QRHC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 1.30x
- Better valuation composite
RSG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 5.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 353.8% 10Y total return vs QRHC's -66.3%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs QRHC's -13.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs QRHC's -13.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs QRHC's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (5.0% vs 160.5%) | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -19.0% vs QRHC's -54.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs QRHC's -10.0%, ROIC 13.5% vs -0.2% |
QRHC vs RSG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QRHC vs RSG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RSG is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.7B annually — 66.7x QRHC's $250M. RSG is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QRHC's -6.1%. On growth, RSG holds the edge at +2.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $250M | $16.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$361,000 | $5.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $2.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +22.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +15.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.8% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.9% | +7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QRHC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RSG's 12.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QRHC's 17.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $62.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $87M | $62.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.48x | 29.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.64x | 11.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.09x | 3.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.56x | 5.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.43x | 25.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSG delivers a 18.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-36 for QRHC. RSG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QRHC's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RSG scores 7/9 vs QRHC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -36.2% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.0% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.2% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.60x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $64M | $520M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $596M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.02x | 8.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSG five years ago would be worth $19,137 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,042 for QRHC. Over the past 12 months, RSG leads with a -19.0% total return vs QRHC's -54.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSG at 12.6% vs QRHC's -41.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.5% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.8% | -19.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.2% | +42.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +91.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | +353.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.7% | +12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RSG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSG is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QRHC's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSG currently trades 77.9% from its 52-week high vs QRHC's 40.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | -0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.64 | $258.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.81 | $198.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.9% | +77.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 31.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 62K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
RSG is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $239.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
RSG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QRHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
QRHC vs RSG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QRHC or RSG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the stronger pick with 3. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 3% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) offers the better valuation at 29. 4x trailing P/E (27. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QRHC or RSG?
Over the past 5 years, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) delivered a total return of +91. 4%, compared to -69. 6% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSG returned +353. 8% versus QRHC's -66. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QRHC or RSG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 15β versus Quest Resource Holding Corporation's 1. 21β — meaning QRHC is approximately -909% more volatile than RSG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Republic Services, Inc. (RSG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 160% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — QRHC or RSG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is pulling ahead at 3. 5% versus -13. 3% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation (QRHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Republic Services, Inc. grew EPS 5. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RSG leads at 7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QRHC or RSG?
Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -6. 1% for Quest Resource Holding Corporation — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSG leads at 20. 0% versus -0. 1% for QRHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RSG leads at 30. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — QRHC or RSG?
In this comparison, RSG (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. QRHC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is QRHC or RSG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Republic Services, Inc.
(RSG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 15), 1. 2% yield, +353. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSG: +353. 8%, QRHC: -66. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between QRHC and RSG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
RSG pays a dividend while QRHC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.