QRVO vs CRUS

For growth investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 1% for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Qorvo, Inc.

(QRVO) is the cheapest at 24. 6x versus Cirrus Logic, Inc. at 27. 9x. On forward P/E, Qorvo, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.

Over the past 5 years, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) delivered a total return of +119. 6%, compared to -51. 8% for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CRUS returned +408. 3% versus QRVO's +92. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Qorvo, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning QRVO is approximately 18% more volatile than CRUS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 46% for Qorvo, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -1. 1% for Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qorvo, Inc. grew EPS 524. 1% year-over-year, compared to 22. 4% for Cirrus Logic, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRUS leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 5% net margin versus 9. 2% for Qorvo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRUS leads at 21. 6% versus 11. 2% for QRVO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRUS leads at 52. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Qorvo, Inc.

(QRVO) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for Cirrus Logic, Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QRVO: -4. 1% to $85. 29.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cirrus Logic, Inc.

(CRUS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +408. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CRUS: +408. 3%, QRVO: +92. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.