QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$27.42B
5Y Perf.+45.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
QSR vs JACK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
Restaurants
Market Cap$266M
5Y Perf.-79.3%
QSR vs JACK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | QSR | JACK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $27.42B | $266M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.59B | $1.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $955M | $-69M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 27.6% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | -2.8% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 4.0x |
| Total Debt | $17.58B | $3.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.16B | $52M |
QSR vs JACK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
QSR
JACK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Restaurant Brands I… (QSR) | 100 | 145.1 | +45.1% |
| Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) | 100 | 20.7 | -79.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QSR vs JACK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: QSR leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Jack in the Box Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
The Income Pick
QSR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 3.1%
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- 132.2% 10Y total return vs JACK's -59.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
The Value Play
JACK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 19.5x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | QSR | 12.2% revenue growth vs JACK's -6.7% |
| Value | JACK | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 19.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | QSR | 10.0% margin vs JACK's -5.2% |
| Stability / Safety | QSR | Beta 0.39 vs JACK's 1.69 |
| Dividends | QSR | 3.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs JACK's 6.3% |
| Momentum (1Y) | QSR | +20.3% vs JACK's -47.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | QSR | 3.8% ROA vs JACK's -2.7%, ROIC 8.2% vs -0.6% |
QSR vs JACK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
QSR vs JACK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLQSRLAGGINGJACK
JACKJack in the Box Inc.
1leads
QSRRestaurant Brands Int…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs JACKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
QSR6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
JACK4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
QSR5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
QSR6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
QSR2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QSR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QSR is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.6B annually — 7.1x JACK's $1.3B. QSR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to JACK's -5.2%. On growth, QSR holds the edge at +7.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | QSRRestaurant Brands… | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.6B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $955M | -$69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.5B | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +27.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | -2.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | -5.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | -0.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | -25.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.1% | +33.7% |
QSR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, QSR's 17.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JACK's 82.9x.
| Metric | QSRRestaurant Brands… | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $27.4B | $266M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $43.8B | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.68x | -3.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.50x | 4.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.21x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.81x | 82.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.91x | 0.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.01x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.93x | 3.58x |
JACK leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QSR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), QSR scores 6/9 vs JACK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | QSRRestaurant Brands… | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.2% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.41x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $16.4B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17.6B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | -0.51x |
QSR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QSR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QSR five years ago would be worth $13,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,723 for JACK. Over the past 12 months, QSR leads with a +20.3% total return vs JACK's -47.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 6.0% vs JACK's -42.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | QSRRestaurant Brands… | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.7% | -25.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.3% | -47.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.0% | -81.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.3% | -82.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.2% | -59.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.0% | -42.7% |
QSR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QSR is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JACK's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QSR currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs JACK's 47.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | QSRRestaurant Brands… | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.39x | 1.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.96 | $29.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $61.33 | $8.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.6% | +47.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.4 | 58.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 837K |
QSR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QSR and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QSR as "Buy" and JACK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.6% upside for JACK (target: $20) vs 5.8% for QSR (target: $84). For income investors, JACK offers the higher dividend yield at 6.25% vs QSR's 3.06%.
| Metric | QSRRestaurant Brands… | JACKJack in the Box I… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $83.71 | $19.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | +6.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.42 | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.9% |
Evenly matched — QSR and JACK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
QSR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JACK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallRestaurant Brands Internati… (QSR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
QSR vs JACK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QSR or JACK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) offers the better valuation at 33. 7x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QSR or JACK?
On forward P/E, Jack in the Box Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QSR or JACK?
Over the past 5 years, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) delivered a total return of +30. 3%, compared to -82. 8% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QSR returned +132. 2% versus JACK's -59. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QSR or JACK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Jack in the Box Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning JACK is approximately 331% more volatile than QSR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — QSR or JACK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -6. 7% for Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Restaurant Brands International Inc. grew EPS -26. 1% year-over-year, compared to -127. 6% for Jack in the Box Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QSR leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QSR or JACK?
Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 2% net margin versus -5. 5% for Jack in the Box Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QSR leads at 23. 7% versus -1. 2% for JACK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QSR leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QSR or JACK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Jack in the Box Inc.
(JACK) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — 15. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JACK: 43. 6% to $19. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — QSR or JACK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) offers the highest yield at 6. 3%, versus 3. 1% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR).
09Is QSR or JACK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 3. 1% yield, +132. 2% 10Y return). Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QSR: +132. 2%, JACK: -59. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QSR and JACK?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(QSR: 7.3% · JACK: -25.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.