Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
QTRX vs BIO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
QTRX vs BIO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $129M | $6.95B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $145M | $2.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-104M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 51.9% |
| Operating Margin | -96.4% | 9.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $37M | $1.53B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30M | $532M |
QTRX vs BIO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quanterix Corporati… (QTRX) | 100 | 10.0 | -90.0% |
| Bio-Rad Laboratorie… (BIO) | 100 | 52.4 | -47.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QTRX vs BIO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QTRX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.6%, EPS growth -151.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.6%
- 2.6% revenue growth vs BIO's 0.7%
BIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.92
- 81.4% 10Y total return vs QTRX's -84.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 20.5%, current ratio 5.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.6% revenue growth vs BIO's 0.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.5% margin vs QTRX's -71.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs QTRX's 1.98 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +10.7% vs QTRX's -48.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs QTRX's -26.0%, ROIC 2.6% vs -21.4% |
QTRX vs BIO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
QTRX vs BIO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIO is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 17.9x QTRX's $145M. BIO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QTRX's -71.9%. On growth, QTRX holds the edge at +20.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $145M | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$125M | -$315M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$104M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$83M | $357M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +51.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -96.4% | +9.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -71.9% | +6.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -57.2% | +13.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.3% | +1.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.2% | -9.5% |
Valuation Metrics
QTRX leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $129M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $136M | $7.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.10x | 9.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.93x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.40x | 0.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIO leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIO delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-35 for QTRX. QTRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BIO's 0.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIO scores 5/9 vs QTRX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.2% | +2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -26.0% | +2.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.4% | +2.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.7% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7M | $999M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30M | $532M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BIO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIO five years ago would be worth $4,232 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $490 for QTRX. Over the past 12 months, BIO leads with a +10.7% total return vs QTRX's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIO at -12.1% vs QTRX's -45.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -57.2% | -15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -48.7% | +10.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.1% | -32.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.1% | -57.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | +81.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.8% | -12.1% |
Risk & Volatility
BIO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QTRX's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIO currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs QTRX's 31.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.98x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.77 | $343.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.56 | $211.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.4% | +75.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 37.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 937K | 306K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates QTRX as "Buy" and BIO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 45.5% upside for QTRX (target: $4) vs 21.4% for BIO (target: $313).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $4.00 | $312.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.3% |
BIO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QTRX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
QTRX vs BIO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QTRX or BIO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) is the stronger pick with 2.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO). Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — QTRX or BIO?
Over the past 5 years, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) delivered a total return of -57. 7%, compared to -95. 1% for Quanterix Corporation (QTRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIO returned +81. 4% versus QTRX's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — QTRX or BIO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Quanterix Corporation's 1. 98β — meaning QTRX is approximately 114% more volatile than BIO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 21% for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — QTRX or BIO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) is pulling ahead at 2.
6% versus 0. 7% for Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. (BIO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. grew EPS 142. 6% year-over-year, compared to -151. 0% for Quanterix Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, QTRX leads at 9. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — QTRX or BIO?
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 4% net margin versus -77. 1% for Quanterix Corporation — meaning it keeps 29. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIO leads at 10. 5% versus -62. 9% for QTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIO leads at 52. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is QTRX or BIO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for QTRX: 45.
5% to $4. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — QTRX or BIO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is QTRX or BIO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
(BIO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92)). Quanterix Corporation (QTRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIO: +81. 4%, QTRX: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between QTRX and BIO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: QTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIO is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.