Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Security & Protection Services
Solar
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Security & Protection Services | Solar | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $21M | $1.25B | $51M | $2.92T | $48.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.23B | $146M | $6M | $742.78B | $11.60B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.44B | $-33M | $-64M | $90.80B | $2.04B |
| Gross Margin | 34.3% | 51.6% | 4.5% | 50.6% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | -33.2% | -219.0% | 11.5% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 34.8x | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $6.45B | $42M | $29M | $152.99B | $7.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.97B | $49M | $251K | $86.81B | $1.87B |
QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| QVC Group Inc. (QVCGP) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Evolv Technologies … (EVLV) | 100 | 62.1 | -37.9% |
| VivoPower Internati… (VVPR) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 132.3 | +32.3% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
QVCGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 4.8% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
EVLV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 40.5%, EPS growth 41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 1.23x
- +76.2% vs QVCGP's -90.8%
VVPR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 281.3% revenue growth vs QVCGP's -8.0%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs EBAY's 369.5%
- 11.5% ROA vs VVPR's -201.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs -35.1%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- Beta 0.73, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.10x
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 34.8x)
- 17.6% margin vs VVPR's -10.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 281.3% revenue growth vs QVCGP's -8.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs VVPR's -10.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs VVPR's 2.21 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, vs EBAY's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.2% vs QVCGP's -90.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs VVPR's -201.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs -35.1% |
QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 2 of 6 categories
QVCGP leads 1 • AMZN leads 1 • EVLV leads 0 • VVPR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 115950.0x VVPR's $6M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VVPR's -10.0%. On growth, EVLV holds the edge at +32.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.2B | $146M | $6M | $742.8B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $757M | -$24M | -$11M | $155.9B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.4B | -$33M | -$64M | $90.8B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | -$20M | -$9M | -$2.5B | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.3% | +51.6% | +4.5% | +50.6% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -33.2% | -2.2% | +11.5% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.4% | -22.7% | -10.0% | +12.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -14.0% | -144.3% | -0.3% | +14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.1% | +32.3% | -98.9% | +16.6% | +19.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.2% | +158.1% | +77.7% | +74.8% | +5.7% |
Valuation Metrics
QVCGP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 24.5x trailing earnings, EBAY trades at a 35% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QVCGP's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EBAY's 21.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $1.3B | $51M | $2.92T | $48.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.5B | $1.2B | $80M | $2.98T | $54.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -35.67x | -1.58x | 37.82x | 24.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 34.77x | 17.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.35x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.95x | — | — | 20.47x | 21.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 8.58x | 834.01x | 4.07x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.06x | 1.00x | 7.14x | 10.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.83x | — | — | 378.98x | 29.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-64 for VVPR. EVLV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs QVCGP's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -30.4% | -63.6% | +23.3% | +44.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | -11.6% | -2.0% | +11.5% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | -30.7% | -35.1% | +14.7% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | -25.4% | -69.5% | +15.3% | +17.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.35x | 1.45x | 0.37x | 1.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.5B | -$7M | $29M | $66.2B | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.0B | $49M | $251,000 | $86.8B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.4B | $42M | $29M | $153.0B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.21x | -29.58x | -2.94x | 39.96x | 10.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $450 for VVPR. Over the past 12 months, EVLV leads with a +76.2% total return vs QVCGP's -90.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs VVPR's -20.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.6% | +6.5% | +23.7% | +19.7% | +22.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.8% | +76.2% | -14.9% | +43.7% | +54.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.9% | +78.8% | -50.3% | +156.2% | +137.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | -27.9% | -95.5% | +64.8% | +86.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.8% | -26.7% | -97.0% | +697.8% | +369.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.5% | +21.4% | -20.8% | +36.8% | +33.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — QVCGP and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QVCGP is the less volatile stock with a -0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VVPR's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs QVCGP's 9.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.49x | 1.23x | 2.21x | 1.51x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.25 | $8.91 | $8.88 | $278.56 | $111.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.44 | $4.00 | $1.20 | $185.01 | $67.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.1% | +80.1% | +34.1% | +97.3% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 66.0 | 54.5 | 81.1 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 556K | 2.9M | 427K | 45.5M | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — QVCGP and EBAY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVLV as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for EVLV (target: $10) vs 3.1% for EBAY (target: $110). For income investors, QVCGP offers the higher dividend yield at 4.83% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | — | $306.77 | $109.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | — | 94 | 68 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | — | — | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | — | — | — | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% |
EBAY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QVCGP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
QVCGP vs EVLV vs VVPR vs AMZN vs EBAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is the stronger pick with 281.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 0% for QVC Group Inc. (QVCGP). eBay Inc. (EBAY) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY?
On trailing P/E, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the cheapest at 24. 5x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, eBay Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -95. 5% for VivoPower International PLC (VVPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus VVPR's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QVC Group Inc.
(QVCGP) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 49β versus VivoPower International PLC's 2. 21β — meaning VVPR is approximately -554% more volatile than QVCGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. (EVLV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) is pulling ahead at 281.
3% versus -8. 0% for QVC Group Inc. (QVCGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: VivoPower International PLC grew EPS 87. 3% year-over-year, compared to -86. 0% for QVC Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVLV leads at 40. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -209. 7% for VivoPower International PLC — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -143. 3% for VVPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 17. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVLV: 40. 2% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY?
In this comparison, QVCGP (4.
8% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. EVLV, VVPR, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is QVCGP or EVLV or VVPR or AMZN or EBAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QVC Group Inc.
(QVCGP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 49), 4. 8% yield). VivoPower International PLC (VVPR) carries a higher beta of 2. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QVCGP: -61. 8%, VVPR: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between QVCGP and EVLV and VVPR and AMZN and EBAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (QVCGP (Consumer Cyclical) and EVLV (Industrials) and VVPR (Energy) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: QVCGP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EVLV is a small-cap high-growth stock; VVPR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. QVCGP, EBAY pay a dividend while EVLV, VVPR, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.