Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Staffing & Employment Services
R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $9.53B | $59.14B | $6.51B | $790M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $12.66B | $16.36B | $1.90B | $1.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $495M | $2.51B | $340M | $35M |
| Gross Margin | 26.0% | 36.3% | 33.6% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 24.7% | 25.2% | 3.8% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 20.1x | 18.3x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $8.68B | $16.48B | $12.81B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $198M | $459M | $4.98B | $2M |
R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ryder System, Inc. (R) | 100 | 705.8 | +605.8% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 291.9 | +191.9% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
R is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (16.6x vs 18.3x)
- +73.7% vs KFRC's +18.9%
URI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs R's 287.8%
- PEG 0.78 vs GATX's 0.83
GATX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.8%, EPS growth 17.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- 9.8% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 17.9% margin vs KFRC's 2.6%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs R's 1.39, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.8% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.6x vs 18.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs KFRC's 2.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs R's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs R's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.7% vs KFRC's +18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs GATX's 2.2%, ROIC 19.1% vs 3.7% |
R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GATX leads in 1 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • R leads 1 • URI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GATX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 12.3x KFRC's $1.3B. GATX is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KFRC's 2.6%. On growth, GATX holds the edge at +38.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $12.7B | $16.4B | $1.9B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $6.5B | $823M | $56M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $495M | $2.5B | $340M | $35M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $478M | $1.5B | -$297M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.0% | +36.3% | +33.6% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +24.7% | +25.2% | +3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +15.3% | +17.9% | +2.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +9.1% | -15.6% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | +7.2% | +38.4% | +0.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.1% | +5.6% | +9.3% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — R and GATX and KFRC each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.1x trailing earnings, GATX trades at a 18% valuation discount to URI's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs GATX's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $59.1B | $6.5B | $790M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18.0B | $75.2B | $14.3B | $858M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.17x | 24.45x | 20.08x | 22.05x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.57x | 20.14x | 18.28x | 17.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.94x | 1.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.42x | 10.61x | 14.52x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.75x | 3.67x | 3.74x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.31x | 6.80x | 1.80x | 6.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.77x | 89.34x | — | 16.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
R delivers a 39.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $11 for GATX. KFRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.56x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GATX's 3.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), R scores 9/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +39.5% | +27.9% | +10.7% | +27.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +8.4% | +2.2% | +9.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +12.4% | +3.7% | +19.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +15.6% | +4.1% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.84x | 1.84x | 3.52x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.5B | $16.0B | $7.8B | $68M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $198M | $459M | $5.0B | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $16.5B | $12.8B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.13x | 5.72x | 1.04x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
R leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in R five years ago would be worth $29,350 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,325 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, R leads with a +73.7% total return vs KFRC's +18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors R at 44.7% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.0% | +12.0% | +7.6% | +39.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +73.7% | +46.0% | +28.5% | +18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +202.7% | +182.8% | +68.4% | -13.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.5% | +178.0% | +87.5% | -16.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +287.8% | +1482.5% | +359.5% | +195.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.7% | +41.4% | +19.0% | -4.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — R and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than R's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. R currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs GATX's 89.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 1.19x | 0.71x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $258.49 | $1021.47 | $205.56 | $47.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $139.89 | $647.05 | $143.46 | $24.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +92.4% | +89.1% | +91.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 69.4 | 64.4 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 373K | 557K | 188K | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — R and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: R as "Buy", URI as "Buy", GATX as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 2.3% for R (target: $247). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs URI's 0.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $247.33 | $1037.13 | $212.00 | $71.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 40 | 14 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.4% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 21 | 4 | 19 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.47 | $7.18 | $2.51 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.4% | +3.3% | +1.0% | +6.4% |
GATX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). KFRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
R vs URI vs GATX vs KFRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is R or URI or GATX or KFRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the stronger pick with 9.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). GATX Corporation (GATX) offers the better valuation at 20. 1x trailing P/E (18. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Ryder System, Inc. (R) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — R or URI or GATX or KFRC?
On trailing P/E, GATX Corporation (GATX) is the cheapest at 20.
1x versus United Rentals, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Ryder System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus GATX Corporation's 0. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — R or URI or GATX or KFRC?
Over the past 5 years, Ryder System, Inc.
(R) delivered a total return of +193. 5%, compared to -16. 8% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus KFRC's +195. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — R or URI or GATX or KFRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Ryder System, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning R is approximately 163% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kforce Inc. (KFRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 4% for GATX Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — R or URI or GATX or KFRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GATX Corporation (GATX) is pulling ahead at 9.
8% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GATX Corporation grew EPS 17. 2% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — R or URI or GATX or KFRC?
GATX Corporation (GATX) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
2% net margin versus 2. 6% for Kforce Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GATX leads at 30. 7% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GATX leads at 48. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is R or URI or GATX or KFRC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus GATX Corporation's 0. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ryder System, Inc. (R) trades at 16. 6x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for United Rentals, Inc. — 3. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — R or URI or GATX or KFRC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 0. 8% for United Rentals, Inc. (URI).
09Is R or URI or GATX or KFRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, R: +287. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between R and URI and GATX and KFRC?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: R is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GATX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.