Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RADX vs RNAZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
RADX vs RNAZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $33M | $7M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-27M |
| Gross Margin | 1.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -10.5% | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $38K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $6M |
RADX vs RNAZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiopharm Theranos… (RADX) | 100 | 92.4 | -7.6% |
| TransCode Therapeut… (RNAZ) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RADX vs RNAZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RADX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.88
- -76.5% 10Y total return vs RNAZ's -100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, current ratio 2.67x
RNAZ is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 98.6%
- -0.4% margin vs RADX's -10.6%
- -0.5% ROA vs RADX's -48.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs RNAZ's -87.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs RADX's -10.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.88 vs RNAZ's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.4% vs RNAZ's -19.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.5% ROA vs RADX's -48.4% |
RADX vs RNAZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RADX and RNAZ operate at a comparable scale, with $4M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -380.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RADX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $7M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12M | $896,691 |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.08x | -0.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.42x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RADX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RNAZ delivers a -1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-109 for RADX.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -109.2% | -1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.4% | -0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -60.6% | -5.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | -$6M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $38,291 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -584.59x | -3431.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RADX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RADX five years ago would be worth $2,349 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for RNAZ. Over the past 12 months, RADX leads with a -4.4% total return vs RNAZ's -19.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RADX at -38.3% vs RNAZ's -96.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.6% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.4% | -19.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.5% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.3% | -96.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RADX and RNAZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RADX is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RNAZ's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNAZ currently trades 38.1% from its 52-week high vs RADX's 25.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.25 | $20.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.62 | $6.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.5% | +38.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 31.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 184K | 8K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RADX leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
RADX vs RNAZ: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Which is the better long-term investment — RADX or RNAZ?
Over the past 5 years, Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (RADX) delivered a total return of -76.
5%, compared to -100. 0% for TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. (RNAZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RADX returned -76. 5% versus RNAZ's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
02Which is safer — RADX or RNAZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (RADX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus TransCode Therapeutics, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning RNAZ is approximately 8% more volatile than RADX relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — RADX or RNAZ?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
grew EPS 98. 6% year-over-year, compared to 85. 3% for Radiopharm Theranostics Limited. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — RADX or RNAZ?
TransCode Therapeutics, Inc.
(RNAZ) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1055. 3% for Radiopharm Theranostics Limited — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RNAZ leads at 0. 0% versus -1050. 6% for RADX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RADX leads at 1. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — RADX or RNAZ?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is RADX or RNAZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (RADX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RADX: -76. 5%, RNAZ: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between RADX and RNAZ?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RADX is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNAZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.