Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs CLIR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
RAIN vs CLIR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls |
| Market Cap | $3M | $254M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $2M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 32.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | -348.9% |
| Total Debt | $4M | $188K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $14M |
RAIN vs CLIR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| ClearSign Technolog… (CLIR) | 100 | 39.6 | -60.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs CLIR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.20
- -80.0% 10Y total return vs CLIR's -88.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.20, current ratio 0.12x
CLIR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 80.9%
- 49.6% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2%
- -10.6% vs RAIN's -75.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.6% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.4% margin vs CLIR's -294.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs CLIR's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.6% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -49.8% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs CLIR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs CLIR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CLIR and RAIN operate at a comparable scale, with $2M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $2M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | -$4M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +32.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -182.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -42.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CLIR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $254M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $240M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | -43.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 70.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLIR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLIR scores 4/9 vs RAIN's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -69.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | -49.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -67.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $188,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLIR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RAIN five years ago would be worth $2,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,093 for CLIR. Over the past 12 months, CLIR leads with a -10.6% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLIR at -22.1% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | -10.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -52.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -89.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | -88.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | -22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAIN and CLIR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CLIR's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLIR currently trades 43.1% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $11.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $0.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +43.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 37K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLIR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
RAIN vs CLIR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIN or CLIR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate ClearSign Technologies Corporation (CLIR) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or CLIR?
Over the past 5 years, Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) delivered a total return of -80.
0%, compared to -89. 1% for ClearSign Technologies Corporation (CLIR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RAIN returned -80. 0% versus CLIR's -88. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RAIN or CLIR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
20β versus ClearSign Technologies Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning CLIR is approximately 19% more volatile than RAIN relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RAIN or CLIR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ClearSign Technologies Corporation grew EPS 15.
4% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RAIN or CLIR?
Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
0% net margin versus -147. 4% for ClearSign Technologies Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RAIN leads at 0. 0% versus -180. 4% for CLIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLIR leads at 31. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or CLIR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is RAIN or CLIR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
20)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RAIN: -80. 0%, CLIR: -88. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RAIN and CLIR?
These companies operate in different sectors (RAIN (Utilities) and CLIR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLIR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.