Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RAIN vs CWCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
RAIN vs CWCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $3M | $529M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $132M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | — | 36.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 139015.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 31.6x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $708.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $33K | $123.79T |
RAIN vs CWCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rain Enhancement Te… (RAIN) | 100 | 39.0 | -61.0% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 126.7 | +26.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAIN vs CWCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, RAIN is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
CWCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- Rev growth -1.4%, EPS growth -100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.0%
- 155.1% 10Y total return vs RAIN's -80.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.4% revenue growth vs RAIN's -121.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.9% margin vs RAIN's -2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs RAIN's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs RAIN's -75.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.0% ROA vs RAIN's -298.9% |
RAIN vs CWCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RAIN vs CWCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CWCO and RAIN operate at a comparable scale, with $132M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $132M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $25.98T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $33.67T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +36.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +139015.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +254916.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -11.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $529M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | -$123.08T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.64x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -4.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 4.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 0.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CWCO scores 5/9 vs RAIN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | 0.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.0% | 0.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +26.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$123.08T |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $32,604 | $123.79T |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $708.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -148.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWCO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,000 for RAIN. Over the past 12 months, CWCO leads with a +47.9% total return vs RAIN's -75.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWCO at 26.3% vs RAIN's -41.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -70.8% | -3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.1% | +47.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +101.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +197.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -80.0% | +155.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -41.5% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CWCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RAIN's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs RAIN's 15.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.58 | $39.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.43 | $22.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +15.2% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 47.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 19K | 163K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
CWCO is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $497756.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns.
RAIN vs CWCO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAIN or CWCO a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RAIN or CWCO?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -80. 0% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc (RAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CWCO returned +155. 1% versus RAIN's -80. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RAIN or CWCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc's 1. 20β — meaning RAIN is approximately 58% more volatile than CWCO relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — RAIN or CWCO?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. grew EPS -100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -34. 9% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RAIN or CWCO?
Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus 0. 0% for Rain Enhancement Technologies Holdco Inc — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 0. 0% for RAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CWCO leads at 36. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — RAIN or CWCO?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. RAIN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is RAIN or CWCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 100. 0% yield, +155. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWCO: +155. 1%, RAIN: -80. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between RAIN and CWCO?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CWCO pays a dividend while RAIN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.