Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Security & Protection Services
RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Machinery | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $354K | $15.81B | $26.19B | $11.27B | $5.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53M | $4.33B | $6.00B | $1.13B | $7.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $189M | $906M | $187M | $-527M |
| Gross Margin | 14.6% | 38.1% | 35.5% | 30.1% | 29.4% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 7.5% | 20.8% | 19.8% | 8.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.2x | 24.9x | 56.4x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $1.33B | $2.61B | $2M | $3.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185K | $341M | $483M | $451M | $661M |
RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erayak Power Soluti… (RAYA) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Generac Holdings In… (GNRC) | 100 | 267.6 | +167.6% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 209.9 | +109.9% |
| Powell Industries, … (POWL) | 100 | 2637.6 | +2537.6% |
| Resideo Technologie… (REZI) | 100 | 241.6 | +141.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RAYA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.13, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.13, current ratio 2.09x
- Beta 1.13 vs REZI's 2.24, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, GNRC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HUBB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 1.1%
- 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs POWL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
POWL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth 20.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 26.8% 10Y total return vs HUBB's 410.2%
- PEG 0.94 vs HUBB's 1.20
- Better valuation composite
REZI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.5% revenue growth vs RAYA's -24.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs RAYA's -24.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.5% margin vs REZI's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.13 vs REZI's 2.24, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs POWL's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +422.2% vs RAYA's -99.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.9% ROA vs REZI's -6.2%, ROIC 90.6% vs 9.0% |
RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
POWL leads in 2 of 6 categories
REZI leads 1 • HUBB leads 1 • RAYA leads 0 • GNRC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GNRC and HUBB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REZI is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 140.6x RAYA's $53M. POWL is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to REZI's -7.1%. On growth, GNRC holds the edge at +12.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $53M | $4.3B | $6.0B | $1.1B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $472M | $1.5B | $232M | $802M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $189M | $906M | $187M | -$527M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $419M | $909M | $143M | -$1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +38.1% | +35.5% | +30.1% | +29.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +7.5% | +20.8% | +19.8% | +8.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +4.4% | +15.1% | +16.5% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -43.9% | +9.7% | +15.2% | +12.6% | -16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -23.2% | +12.4% | +11.1% | +6.5% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -26.1% | +69.9% | +8.3% | -0.8% | +11.4% |
Valuation Metrics
REZI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.8x trailing earnings, HUBB trades at a 70% valuation discount to GNRC's 100.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), POWL offers better value at 1.04x vs HUBB's 1.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $354,408 | $15.8B | $26.2B | $11.3B | $6.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $16.8B | $28.3B | $10.8B | $8.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | 100.15x | 29.78x | 62.46x | -10.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.18x | 24.95x | 56.41x | 12.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.43x | 1.04x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 34.71x | 20.79x | 48.07x | 10.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.02x | 3.76x | 4.48x | 10.21x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 6.05x | 6.84x | 17.62x | 2.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 58.96x | 29.94x | 72.81x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWL delivers a 28.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-18 for REZI. POWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to REZI's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs RAYA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | +7.2% | +24.4% | +28.6% | -18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.1% | +3.4% | +11.6% | +16.9% | -6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.8% | +5.9% | +17.1% | +90.6% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.2% | +6.9% | +20.1% | +37.5% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.35x | 0.51x | 0.68x | 0.00x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $992M | $2.1B | -$449M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $184,856 | $341M | $483M | $451M | $661M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $1.3B | $2.6B | $2M | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.56x | 4.54x | 16.90x | — | -2.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWL five years ago would be worth $255,667 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for RAYA. Over the past 12 months, POWL leads with a +422.2% total return vs RAYA's -99.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors POWL at 162.5% vs RAYA's -90.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -90.2% | +90.9% | +6.7% | +163.4% | +13.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.9% | +123.4% | +40.5% | +422.2% | +98.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +143.9% | +87.7% | +1709.2% | +142.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -11.7% | +161.4% | +2456.7% | +39.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +673.7% | +410.2% | +2683.6% | +37.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -90.1% | +34.6% | +23.4% | +162.5% | +34.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RAYA and GNRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RAYA is the less volatile stock with a 1.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than REZI's 2.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GNRC currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs RAYA's 0.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.69x | 1.32x | 2.08x | 2.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7370.00 | $272.40 | $565.50 | $434.00 | $45.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.39 | $117.22 | $353.52 | $54.75 | $19.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.1% | +98.9% | +87.1% | +71.3% | +87.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 77.1 | 38.0 | 73.9 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.7M | 892K | 547K | 685K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
HUBB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GNRC as "Buy", HUBB as "Hold", POWL as "Hold", REZI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for HUBB (target: $545) vs -23.2% for POWL (target: $238). For income investors, HUBB offers the higher dividend yield at 1.09% vs POWL's 0.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.11 | $545.43 | $237.67 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 39 | 17 | 10 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | +1.1% | +0.1% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 12 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.00 | $5.35 | $0.35 | $0.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.9% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
POWL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). REZI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
RAYA vs GNRC vs HUBB vs POWL vs REZI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 6% for Erayak Power Solution Group Inc. (RAYA). Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) offers the better valuation at 29. 8x trailing P/E (24. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) a "Buy" — based on 39 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI?
On trailing P/E, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the cheapest at 29.
8x versus Generac Holdings Inc. at 100. 2x. On forward P/E, Resideo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Powell Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 94x versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI?
Over the past 5 years, Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) delivered a total return of +24. 6%, compared to -99. 9% for Erayak Power Solution Group Inc. (RAYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWL returned +26. 8% versus RAYA's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Erayak Power Solution Group Inc.
(RAYA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 13β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning REZI is approximately 98% more volatile than RAYA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 109% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resideo Technologies, Inc.
(REZI) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -24. 6% for Erayak Power Solution Group Inc. (RAYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Powell Industries, Inc. grew EPS 20. 9% year-over-year, compared to -3636. 3% for Erayak Power Solution Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, POWL leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI?
Powell Industries, Inc.
(POWL) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 4% net margin versus -7. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus -6. 4% for RAYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 94x versus Hubbell Incorporated's 1. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) trades at 12. 9x forward P/E versus 56. 4x for Powell Industries, Inc. — 43. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HUBB: 10. 7% to $545. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI?
In this comparison, HUBB (1.
1% yield), REZI (0. 6% yield), POWL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. RAYA, GNRC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RAYA or GNRC or HUBB or POWL or REZI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
1% yield, +410. 2% 10Y return). Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 2%, POWL: +26. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RAYA and GNRC and HUBB and POWL and REZI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
HUBB, REZI pay a dividend while RAYA, GNRC, POWL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.