Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
RBKB logo
RBKB
CZWI logo
CZWI
JPM logo
JPM
FIS logo
FIS
BWFG logo
BWFG
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
RBKB
Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$186M
5Y Perf.+154.7%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+212.8%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$896.00B
5Y Perf.+241.0%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$20.26B
5Y Perf.-70.8%
BWFG
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$444M
5Y Perf.+249.9%

RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
RBKB logoRBKB
CZWI logoCZWI
JPM logoJPM
FIS logoFIS
BWFG logoBWFG
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedInformation Technology ServicesBanks - Regional
Market Cap$186M$207M$896.00B$20.26B$444M
Revenue (TTM)$76M$90M$280.33B$11.66B$208M
Net Income (TTM)$10M$14M$57.05B$2.67B$35M
Gross Margin68.2%54.7%60.0%37.6%51.6%
Operating Margin16.7%7.0%25.9%17.9%23.3%
Forward P/E18.2x11.8x14.4x6.2x10.3x
Total Debt$30M$52M$942.38B$4.01B$180M
Cash & Equiv.$17M$119M$343.34B$599M$225M

RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

RBKB
CZWI
JPM
FIS
BWFG
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Rhinebeck Bancorp, … (RBKB)100254.7+154.7%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100312.8+212.8%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100341.0+241.0%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10029.2-70.8%
Bankwell Financial … (BWFG)100349.9+249.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. BWFG also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
RBKB
Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RBKB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Rev growth 39.8%, EPS growth 215.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 22.1%, current ratio 493.23x
  • NIM 3.6% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 39.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: defensive
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 465.8% 10Y total return vs BWFG's 198.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
  • 22.9% margin vs RBKB's 13.2%
  • 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
BWFG
Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BWFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.24 vs CZWI's 2.32
  • +57.3% vs FIS's -49.4%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRBKB logoRBKB39.8% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.2x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.81
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs RBKB's 13.2%
Stability / SafetyRBKB logoRBKBBeta 0.29 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BWFG logoBWFG+57.3% vs FIS's -49.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs RBKB's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 5.2%

RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
RBKBRhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B
BWFGBankwell Financial Group, Inc.
FY 2019
Service Charges and Fees
100.0%$1M

RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGBWFG

Who Leads Where

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories

RBKB leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 5 tied

Explore the data ↓
BWFGBankwell Financial Gr…
0leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
0leads
CZWICitizens Community Ba…
0leads
RBKBRhinebeck Bancorp, In…
0leads
FISFidelity National Inf…
1leads
6 Total Categories

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 3696.1x RBKB's $76M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RBKB's 13.2%.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$76M$90M$280.3B$11.7B$208M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$14M$9M$81.4B$4.1B$53M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$10M$14M$57.0B$2.7B$35M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$11M$11M$100.9B$2.8B-$5M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+68.2%+54.7%+60.0%+37.6%+51.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.7%+7.0%+25.9%+17.9%+23.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.2%+16.0%+20.4%+22.9%+16.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.9%+12.4%+36.0%+23.9%-2.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+184.0%+63.0%+16.0%+30.6%+2.1%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.5x trailing earnings, BWFG trades at a 76% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BWFG offers better value at 0.29x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…
Market CapShares × price$186M$207M$896.0B$20.3B$444M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$200M$140M$1.50T$23.7B$398M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.16x14.70x16.00x52.27x12.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.79x14.40x6.24x10.27x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.68x2.90x0.90x2.14x0.29x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.70x15.69x18.36x6.50x7.58x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.45x2.29x3.20x1.90x2.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.34x1.11x2.47x1.46x1.44x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF17.09x19.90x8.88x7.21x16.98x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — RBKB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for RBKB. RBKB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBKB scores 8/9 vs JPM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.7%+7.8%+15.9%+18.4%+12.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.8%+0.8%+1.3%+7.5%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.2%+2.0%+4.5%+6.0%+8.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.7%+0.6%+8.9%+6.6%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–986566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.22x0.28x2.60x0.29x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$13M-$67M$599.0B$3.4B-$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$119M$343.3B$599M$225M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$30M$52M$942.4B$4.0B$180M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.56x0.16x0.74x21.16x0.49x
Evenly matched — RBKB and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CZWI and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +57.3% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+39.5%+24.3%-0.5%-38.9%+24.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+34.8%+52.1%+21.8%-49.4%+57.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+151.9%+153.7%+138.2%-18.9%+132.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+55.7%+69.0%+118.2%-67.3%+111.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+42.2%+149.0%+465.8%-25.6%+198.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+36.1%+36.4%+33.6%-6.8%+32.5%
Evenly matched — CZWI and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — RBKB and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

RBKB is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.29x0.50x0.94x0.61x0.65x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.99$22.62$337.25$82.74$56.48
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.41$12.83$262.71$37.91$33.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.9%+94.9%+95.1%+47.4%+98.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.251.259.130.863.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded11K41K7.0M5.6M44K
Evenly matched — RBKB and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs 5.9% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs BWFG's 1.44%.

MetricRBKB logoRBKBRhinebeck Bancorp…CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …FIS logoFISFidelity National…BWFG logoBWFGBankwell Financia…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$339.75$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts261373
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+1.9%+4.2%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises61510
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.37$5.95$1.63$0.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+3.0%+3.9%+7.0%+0.3%
Evenly matched — JPM and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics. 5 categories are tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

RBKB vs CZWI vs JPM vs FIS vs BWFG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

(RBKB) is the stronger pick with 39. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?

On trailing P/E, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.

(BWFG) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

(RBKB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately 224% more volatile than RBKB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. (RBKB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.

(RBKB) is pulling ahead at 39. 8% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?

JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBKB leads at 68. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. (BWFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 8. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG?

In this comparison, FIS (4.

2% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield), BWFG (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. RBKB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is RBKB or CZWI or JPM or FIS or BWFG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 50), 1. 7% yield, +149. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +149. 0%, RBKB: +42. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between RBKB and CZWI and JPM and FIS and BWFG?

These companies operate in different sectors (RBKB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and BWFG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: RBKB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock. CZWI, JPM, FIS, BWFG pay a dividend while RBKB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.