Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $1.03B | $4.82B | $10.69B | $10.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26M | $300K | $78M | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-59M | $-618M | $-957M | $29M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — | 11.2% | 18.3% |
| Operating Margin | -234.6% | -2431.0% | -10.2% | 1.8% |
| Forward P/E | 94.3x | — | — | 76.4x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $42M | $61M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $168M | $1.02B | $241M | $561M |
RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Cat Holdings, I… (RCAT) | 100 | 345.7 | +245.7% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 94.0 | -6.0% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 211.0 | +111.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 459.8%, EPS growth 29.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 106.6%
- +81.9% vs ACHR's -26.0%
ACHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JOBY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.84, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.84, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
KTOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.87
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs JOBY's 3.5%
- Better valuation composite
- 2.1% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.87 vs RCAT's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.9% vs ACHR's -26.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 1.4% vs -54.7% |
RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTOS leads in 3 of 6 categories
RCAT leads 1 • ACHR leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4717.3x ACHR's $300,000. KTOS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $26M | $300,000 | $78M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | -$709M | -$759M | $72M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$59M | -$618M | -$957M | $29M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$75M | -$512M | -$661M | -$134M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | — | +11.2% | +18.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -2431.0% | -10.2% | +1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -2060.7% | -12.3% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | -1705.7% | -8.5% | -9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +22.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +43.5% | -9.1% | +133.3% |
Valuation Metrics
KTOS leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $4.8B | $10.7B | $10.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $876M | $3.8B | $10.5B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.28x | -6.55x | -9.62x | 445.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 94.27x | — | — | 76.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 120.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 25.17x | 9999.00x | 200.04x | 8.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.04x | 1.84x | 6.37x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KTOS's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.6% | -37.8% | -74.2% | +1.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.8% | -32.9% | -52.1% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -71.0% | -89.6% | -54.7% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -42.9% | -44.3% | -49.8% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$149M | -$979M | -$180M | -$381M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $168M | $1.0B | $241M | $561M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $42M | $61M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 6.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCAT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCAT five years ago would be worth $26,865 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,572 for ACHR. Over the past 12 months, RCAT leads with a +81.9% total return vs ACHR's -26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCAT at 125.6% vs JOBY's 35.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.2% | -20.3% | -24.3% | -27.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.9% | -26.0% | +63.5% | +69.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1048.4% | +202.8% | +148.7% | +338.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +168.7% | -34.3% | +9.9% | +125.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -35.0% | +3.5% | +1252.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +125.6% | +44.7% | +35.5% | +63.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCAT and KTOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KTOS is the less volatile stock with a 1.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCAT's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCAT currently trades 55.2% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 43.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.09x | 2.95x | 2.84x | 1.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.78 | $14.62 | $20.95 | $134.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.43 | $4.80 | $6.42 | $32.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.2% | +44.3% | +51.9% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 58.3 | 58.9 | 33.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 15.8M | 27.8M | 24.5M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCAT as "Buy", ACHR as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", KTOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 90.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 41.9% for JOBY (target: $15).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $12.33 | $15.42 | $109.58 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 | 8 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KTOS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RCAT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
RCAT vs ACHR vs JOBY vs KTOS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 18. 5% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) offers the better valuation at 445. 3x trailing P/E (76. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS?
On forward P/E, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 76. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS?
Over the past 5 years, Red Cat Holdings, Inc.
(RCAT) delivered a total return of +168. 7%, compared to -34. 3% for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1253% versus RCAT's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 87β versus Red Cat Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning RCAT is approximately 65% more volatile than KTOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 18. 5% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Archer Aviation Inc. grew EPS 30. 3% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCAT leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS?
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KTOS leads at 2. 1% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KTOS leads at 22. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) trades at 76. 4x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Red Cat Holdings, Inc. — 17. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 90. 3% to $12. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RCAT or ACHR or JOBY or KTOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1253% 10Y return). Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTOS: +1253%, RCAT: -97. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCAT and ACHR and JOBY and KTOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (RCAT (Technology) and ACHR (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials) and KTOS (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RCAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.