RCI
Rogers Communications Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$19.76B
5Y Perf.-12.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RCI vs T
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
T
AT&T Inc.
Telecommunications Services
Market Cap$176.40B
5Y Perf.+8.5%
RCI vs T — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RCI | T |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $19.76B | $176.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.68B | $126.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.97B | $21.41B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $44.18B | $173.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.34B | $18.23B |
RCI vs T — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RCI
T
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Communicatio… (RCI) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| AT&T Inc. (T) | 100 | 108.5 | +8.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCI vs T
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: RCI leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. AT&T Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
RCI
Rogers Communications Inc.
The Growth Play
RCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 297.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.1%
- 5.3% revenue growth vs T's 2.7%
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 10.9x)
Best for: growth exposure
T
AT&T Inc.
The Income Pick
T is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta -0.26, yield 4.5%
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs RCI's 36.2%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.26, current ratio 0.91x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | RCI | 5.3% revenue growth vs T's 2.7% |
| Value | RCI | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 10.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | RCI | 33.7% margin vs T's 16.9% |
| Stability / Safety | T | Lower D/E ratio (135.4% vs 182.0%) |
| Dividends | T | 4.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs RCI's 3.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | RCI | +49.3% vs T's -6.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | RCI | 8.0% ROA vs T's 5.1%, ROIC 6.1% vs 6.7% |
RCI vs T — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
RCI vs T — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLRCILAGGINGT
TAT&T Inc.
2leads
RCIRogers Communications…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs TMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RCI5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
RCI5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
T5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
T2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RCI and T each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
T is the larger business by revenue, generating $126.5B annually — 6.1x RCI's $20.7B. RCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to T's 16.9%. On growth, T holds the edge at +2.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RCIRogers Communicat… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.7B | $126.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.3B | $45.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.0B | $21.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | $10.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +16.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | -11.5% |
Evenly matched — RCI and T each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RCI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.9x trailing earnings, RCI trades at a 53% valuation discount to T's 8.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RCI's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than T's 7.4x.
| Metric | RCIRogers Communicat… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.8B | $176.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.1B | $332.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.92x | 8.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.63x | 10.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.05x | 7.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.07x |
RCI leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCI delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $17 for T. T carries lower financial leverage with a 1.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCI's 1.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), T scores 7/9 vs RCI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RCIRogers Communicat… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 1.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42.8B | $155.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $18.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44.2B | $174.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.41x | 4.97x |
RCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
T leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in T five years ago would be worth $12,995 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,674 for RCI. Over the past 12 months, RCI leads with a +49.3% total return vs T's -6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors T at 18.6% vs RCI's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RCIRogers Communicat… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.3% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | +67.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.3% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.2% | +41.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.1% | +18.6% |
T leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCI and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
T is the less volatile stock with a -0.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCI's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCI currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs T's 84.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | RCIRogers Communicat… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | -0.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.14 | $29.79 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.80 | $22.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 38.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 33.7M |
Evenly matched — RCI and T each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RCI as "Hold" and T as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.5% upside for T (target: $29) vs 1.2% for RCI (target: $37). For income investors, T offers the higher dividend yield at 4.51% vs RCI's 3.87%.
| Metric | RCIRogers Communicat… | TAT&T Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $29.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 62 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.93 | $1.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% |
T leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
RCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). T leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallRogers Communications Inc. (RCI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RCI vs T: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCI or T a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for AT&T Inc. (T). Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCI or T?
On trailing P/E, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the cheapest at 3. 9x versus AT&T Inc. at 8. 3x. On forward P/E, Rogers Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCI or T?
Over the past 5 years, AT&T Inc.
(T) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -13. 3% for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: T returned +41. 9% versus RCI's +36. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCI or T?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AT&T Inc.
(T) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 26β versus Rogers Communications Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning RCI is approximately -212% more volatile than T relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AT&T Inc. (T) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 135% versus 182% for Rogers Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCI or T?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus 2. 7% for AT&T Inc. (T). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rogers Communications Inc. grew EPS 297. 8% year-over-year, compared to 104. 0% for AT&T Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCI leads at 12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCI or T?
Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 8% net margin versus 17. 4% for AT&T Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCI leads at 23. 1% versus 19. 2% for T. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — T leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCI or T more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 9x for AT&T Inc. — 0. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for T: 16. 5% to $29. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCI or T?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AT&T Inc. (T) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 3. 9% for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI).
09Is RCI or T better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AT&T Inc.
(T) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 26), 4. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (T: +41. 9%, RCI: +36. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCI and T?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 20%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 10%
- Dividend Yield > 1.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(RCI: -20.8% · T: 2.9%)Net Margin>
%
(RCI: 33.7% · T: 16.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(RCI: 3.9x · T: 8.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.