Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RCI vs VZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
RCI vs VZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $19.76B | $198.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20.68B | $138.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6.97B | $17.17B |
| Gross Margin | 40.6% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 21.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $44.18B | $200.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.34B | $19.05B |
RCI vs VZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rogers Communicatio… (RCI) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Verizon Communicati… (VZ) | 100 | 82.1 | -17.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCI vs VZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.3%, EPS growth 297.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, current ratio 0.61x
- 5.3% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5%
VZ is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.11, yield 5.8%
- 41.6% 10Y total return vs RCI's 36.2%
- Beta -0.11, yield 5.8%, current ratio 0.91x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.3% revenue growth vs VZ's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.7% margin vs VZ's 12.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (182.0% vs 189.7%) | |
| Dividends | 5.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs RCI's 3.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.3% vs VZ's +13.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs VZ's 4.4%, ROIC 6.1% vs 8.0% |
RCI vs VZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RCI vs VZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RCI and VZ each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $138.2B annually — 6.7x RCI's $20.7B. RCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VZ's 12.4%. On growth, VZ holds the edge at +2.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20.7B | $138.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9.3B | $47.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.0B | $17.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.1B | $19.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.6% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +21.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +12.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +14.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.8% | +2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.5% | -53.4% |
Valuation Metrics
RCI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.9x trailing earnings, RCI trades at a 66% valuation discount to VZ's 11.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RCI's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VZ's 8.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.8B | $198.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51.1B | $380.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.92x | 11.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.63x | 9.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.05x | 7.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 1.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.11x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCI delivers a 30.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $16 for VZ. RCI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VZ's 1.90x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +30.9% | +16.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.0% | +4.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.1% | +8.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 1.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $42.8B | $181.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $19.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $44.2B | $200.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.41x | 4.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VZ leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VZ five years ago would be worth $10,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,674 for RCI. Over the past 12 months, RCI leads with a +49.3% total return vs VZ's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VZ at 13.4% vs RCI's -6.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.6% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +49.3% | +13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.2% | +45.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.3% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.2% | +41.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.1% | +13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VZ is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCI's 0.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | -0.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.14 | $51.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.80 | $10.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +91.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.3 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 24.3M |
Analyst Outlook
VZ leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RCI as "Hold" and VZ as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.5% upside for VZ (target: $52) vs 1.2% for RCI (target: $37). For income investors, VZ offers the higher dividend yield at 5.76% vs RCI's 3.87%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $37.00 | $51.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.9% | +5.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.93 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
VZ leads in 3 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). RCI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
RCI vs VZ: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCI or VZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the stronger pick with 5. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) offers the better valuation at 3. 9x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCI or VZ?
On trailing P/E, Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the cheapest at 3. 9x versus Verizon Communications Inc. at 11. 6x. On forward P/E, Verizon Communications Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCI or VZ?
Over the past 5 years, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) delivered a total return of +2. 8%, compared to -13. 3% for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VZ returned +41. 6% versus RCI's +36. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCI or VZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Rogers Communications Inc. 's 0. 29β — meaning RCI is approximately -373% more volatile than VZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 182% versus 190% for Verizon Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCI or VZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is pulling ahead at 5. 3% versus 2. 5% for Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rogers Communications Inc. grew EPS 297. 8% year-over-year, compared to -2. 2% for Verizon Communications Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCI leads at 12. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCI or VZ?
Rogers Communications Inc.
(RCI) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 8% net margin versus 12. 4% for Verizon Communications Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCI leads at 23. 1% versus 21. 2% for VZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VZ leads at 45. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCI or VZ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 10. 6x for Rogers Communications Inc. — 1. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VZ: 9. 5% to $51. 56.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCI or VZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) offers the highest yield at 5. 8%, versus 3. 9% for Rogers Communications Inc. (RCI).
09Is RCI or VZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Verizon Communications Inc.
(VZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), 5. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VZ: +41. 6%, RCI: +36. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCI and VZ?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 20%
- Dividend Yield > 1.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.