Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $17M | $58M | $427M | $1.91B | $5.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66M | $637M | $571M | $1.18B | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $-77M | $-41M | $-12M | $150M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 21.2% | 11.5% | 8.3% | 10.7% |
| Operating Margin | -86.5% | 10.2% | 2.0% | -1.1% | 1.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 1993.6x | 3480.2x |
| Total Debt | $34M | $318M | $383M | $249M | $873M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $6M | $18M | $91M | $28M |
RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.5 | -97.5% |
| KLX Energy Services… (KLXE) | 100 | 45.8 | -54.2% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 493.1 | +393.1% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 316.8 | +216.8% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 642.9 | +542.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.47
- Rev growth -3.7%, EPS growth 52.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 5.88x
Among these 5 stocks, KLXE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +15.1% vs RCON's -49.1%
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (1993.6x vs 3480.2x)
LBRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 94.1% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
- 3.7% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
- 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 4.0% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 2.3% vs -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.7% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1993.6x vs 3480.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs RCON's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs RCON's -49.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs KLXE's -21.3%, ROIC 2.3% vs -9.4% |
RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LBRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
KLXE leads 1 • RCON leads 0 • NINE leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RCON and LBRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 61.1x RCON's $66M. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66M | $637M | $571M | $1.2B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $160M | $61M | $154M | $549M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | -$77M | -$41M | -$12M | $150M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$42M | -$7M | -$11M | -$193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +21.2% | +11.5% | +8.3% | +10.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -86.5% | +10.2% | +2.0% | -1.1% | +1.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -64.3% | -12.1% | -7.2% | -1.1% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -65.9% | -6.5% | -1.2% | -0.9% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | -5.3% | -4.4% | -24.7% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.7% | +13.3% | -34.6% | -134.2% | +16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
KLXE leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KLXE's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $58M | $427M | $1.9B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $371M | $791M | $2.1B | $6.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.22x | -0.79x | -7.88x | 1993.59x | 35.58x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 3480.22x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.71x | 337.01x | 10.67x | 10.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 0.09x | — | 1.50x | 1.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.11x | — | — | 1.98x | 2.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 44.88x | 363.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-9 for RCON. RCON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LBRT's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | — | — | -1.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.0% | -21.3% | -11.5% | -1.0% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | -9.4% | +0.7% | +1.4% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.8% | -11.4% | +0.9% | +1.8% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | — | — | 0.30x | 0.42x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | $313M | $364M | $158M | $846M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $6M | $18M | $91M | $28M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $318M | $383M | $249M | $873M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -372.30x | -0.67x | 0.24x | -0.86x | 5.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NINE and LBRT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs RCON's -49.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 38.6% vs RCON's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.8% | +68.0% | +2682.5% | +58.4% | +68.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.1% | +65.5% | +1505.8% | +201.4% | +186.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | -68.3% | +150.0% | +132.8% | +166.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -72.8% | +385.2% | +41.6% | +132.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | -97.6% | -62.3% | +7.2% | +94.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | -31.8% | +35.7% | +32.5% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCON and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.52x | 3.04x | 1.02x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.16 | $4.06 | $10.23 | $18.50 | $34.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $1.46 | $0.00 | $4.51 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.7% | +80.3% | +96.3% | +84.1% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 56.9 | 82.9 | 51.9 | 58.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 307K | 125K | 3.5M | 4.2M |
Analyst Outlook
LBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). LBRT is the only dividend payer here at 1.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $18.00 | $14.75 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 9 | 30 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% |
LBRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). KLXE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
RCON vs KLXE vs NINE vs PUMP vs LBRT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the stronger pick with -3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (3480. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +102. 6% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 49β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 04β — meaning NINE is approximately 521% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 42% for Liberty Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is pulling ahead at -3. 7% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Liberty Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PUMP leads at -0. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NINE leads at 2. 0% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82.
7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT?
In this comparison, LBRT (1.
0% yield) pays a dividend. RCON, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RCON or KLXE or NINE or PUMP or LBRT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 1. 0% yield, +102. 6% 10Y return). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LBRT: +102. 6%, NINE: -61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCON and KLXE and NINE and PUMP and LBRT?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LBRT pays a dividend while RCON, KLXE, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.