Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $17M | $1.89B | $5.13B | $427M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $66M | $1.40B | $4.05B | $571M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-43M | $22M | $150M | $-41M |
| Gross Margin | 23.0% | 18.2% | 10.7% | 11.5% |
| Operating Margin | -86.5% | 2.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 41.7x | 3480.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $34M | $374M | $873M | $383M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $99M | $18M | $28M | $18M |
RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 283.2 | +183.2% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 615.0 | +515.0% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 485.2 | +385.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.47 vs NINE's 3.21
WTTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.09, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- Beta 1.09, yield 1.9%, current ratio 1.57x
- -3.1% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
LBRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 94.1% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.6%
- 3.7% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
- 4.0% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 2.3% vs 0.7%
NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +15.1% vs RCON's -49.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.1% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs RCON's -64.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.1% vs RCON's -49.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 2.3% vs 0.7% |
RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LBRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
RCON leads 0 • WTTR leads 0 • NINE leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — RCON and LBRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 61.1x RCON's $66M. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $66M | $1.4B | $4.0B | $571M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$54M | $217M | $549M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$43M | $22M | $150M | -$41M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$44M | -$95M | -$193M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.0% | +18.2% | +10.7% | +11.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -86.5% | +2.3% | +1.5% | +2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -64.3% | +1.5% | +3.7% | -7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -65.9% | -6.8% | -4.8% | -1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | -2.3% | +4.5% | -4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.7% | -4.4% | +16.7% | -34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LBRT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 58% valuation discount to WTTR's 84.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LBRT's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17M | $1.9B | $5.1B | $427M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $2.2B | $6.0B | $791M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.22x | 84.10x | 35.58x | -7.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 41.66x | 3480.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.70x | 10.28x | 337.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 1.34x | 1.28x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.11x | 1.88x | 2.53x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 363.85x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-9 for RCON. RCON carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LBRT's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCON scores 4/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.2% | +2.2% | +7.4% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.0% | +1.3% | +4.0% | -11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.6% | +2.3% | +2.3% | +0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -11.8% | +2.9% | +3.0% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.40x | 0.42x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$64M | $356M | $846M | $364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $99M | $18M | $28M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $374M | $873M | $383M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -372.30x | 1.54x | 5.24x | 0.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs RCON's -49.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 38.6% vs RCON's -51.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -45.8% | +52.9% | +68.2% | +2682.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.1% | +134.2% | +186.8% | +1505.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.7% | +135.9% | +166.1% | +150.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +158.4% | +132.4% | +385.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.3% | +26.6% | +94.1% | -62.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -51.6% | +33.1% | +38.6% | +35.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCON and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RCON is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs RCON's 11.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 1.09x | 1.31x | 3.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.16 | $17.95 | $34.41 | $10.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.75 | $7.20 | $9.90 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +11.7% | +93.7% | +92.0% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 69.4 | 58.7 | 82.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 1.7M | 4.2M | 125K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WTTR and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WTTR as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy", NINE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -4.9% for WTTR (target: $16). For income investors, WTTR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.93% vs LBRT's 1.04%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.00 | $34.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 19 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
LBRT leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
RCON vs WTTR vs LBRT vs NINE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger pick with -3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (3480. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Select Water Solutions, Inc. (WTTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE?
On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus Select Water Solutions, Inc. at 84. 1x. On forward P/E, Select Water Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +94. 1% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Recon Technology, Ltd.
(RCON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 585% more volatile than RCON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 42% for Liberty Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is pulling ahead at -3. 1% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Recon Technology, Ltd. grew EPS 52. 6% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Liberty Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WTTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE?
Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) trades at 41. 7x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3438. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE?
In this comparison, WTTR (1.
9% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. RCON, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RCON or WTTR or LBRT or NINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 09), 1. 9% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WTTR: +26. 6%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RCON and WTTR and LBRT and NINE?
These companies operate in different sectors (RCON (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities) and LBRT (Energy) and NINE (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
WTTR, LBRT pay a dividend while RCON, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.