Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction Materials
Construction Materials
Security & Protection Services
RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Construction Materials | Construction Materials | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $4.45B | $186M | $3.13B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.04B | $89M | $369M | $561M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $12M | $131M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | 11.2% | 28.0% | 48.1% | 45.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.0% | 17.6% | 41.6% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 91.8x | 24.2x | 20.1x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.86B | $5M | $4M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $767M | $8M | $371M | $146M |
RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) | 100 | 337.4 | +237.4% |
| Smith-Midland Corpo… (SMID) | 100 | 729.6 | +629.6% |
| United States Lime … (USLM) | 100 | 736.9 | +636.9% |
| Arlo Technologies, … (ARLO) | 100 | 674.2 | +574.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RDNT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMID is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 31.8%, EPS growth 8.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 14.4% 10Y total return vs USLM's 9.5%
- 31.8% revenue growth vs ARLO's 3.6%
USLM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32, yield 0.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.32, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 19.27x
- PEG 0.56 vs SMID's 0.79
- Beta 1.32, yield 0.2%, current ratio 19.27x
ARLO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 24.2x)
- +43.3% vs RDNT's +4.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.8% revenue growth vs ARLO's 3.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 24.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.4% margin vs RDNT's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.32 vs SMID's 1.58, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.3% vs RDNT's +4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.7% ROA vs RDNT's 1.3%, ROIC 48.5% vs 2.0% |
RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
USLM leads in 4 of 6 categories
RDNT leads 1 • SMID leads 0 • ARLO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
USLM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDNT is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 23.0x SMID's $89M. USLM is the more profitable business, keeping 35.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RDNT's 2.3%. On growth, ARLO holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $89M | $369M | $561M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $214M | $18M | $173M | $18M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $12M | $131M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$178M | $5M | $91M | $64M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +28.0% | +48.1% | +45.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +17.6% | +41.6% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +13.2% | +35.4% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.7% | +5.7% | +24.8% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | -9.0% | -3.7% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.1% | -8.5% | -10.9% | — |
Valuation Metrics
RDNT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.4x trailing earnings, USLM trades at a 78% valuation discount to ARLO's 106.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), USLM offers better value at 0.65x vs SMID's 0.79x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $186M | $3.1B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.5B | $183M | $2.8B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -230.00x | 24.15x | 23.40x | 106.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 91.75x | — | 20.09x | 18.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.79x | 0.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 25.88x | 14.60x | 15.11x | 148.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.18x | 2.37x | 8.41x | 3.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.19x | 4.45x | 4.98x | 12.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 52.01x | — | 30.63x | 24.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
USLM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARLO delivers a 22.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $4 for RDNT. USLM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RDNT's 1.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMID scores 7/9 vs USLM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +22.6% | +21.3% | +22.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +13.8% | +19.7% | +9.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +21.2% | +48.5% | +35.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +20.1% | +26.6% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.37x | 0.12x | 0.01x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | -$2M | -$367M | -$140M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $767M | $8M | $371M | $146M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $5M | $4M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.46x | 72.70x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
USLM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in USLM five years ago would be worth $38,598 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,305 for ARLO. Over the past 12 months, ARLO leads with a +43.3% total return vs RDNT's +4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors USLM at 49.6% vs RDNT's 26.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -19.0% | -6.6% | -9.6% | +12.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | +14.2% | +12.6% | +43.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.0% | +114.7% | +234.6% | +116.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.1% | +169.4% | +286.0% | +123.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +947.4% | +1436.8% | +955.0% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +29.0% | +49.6% | +29.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMID and USLM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
USLM is the less volatile stock with a 1.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMID's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMID currently trades 80.2% from its 52-week high vs RDNT's 67.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.43x | 1.58x | 1.32x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $85.84 | $43.66 | $141.44 | $19.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $50.76 | $25.56 | $94.02 | $10.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.0% | +80.2% | +77.3% | +74.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 58.1 | 29.9 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 822K | 9K | 139K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
USLM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RDNT as "Buy", USLM as "Buy", ARLO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.0% upside for RDNT (target: $92) vs 17.4% for ARLO (target: $18). USLM is the only dividend payer here at 0.22% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $92.00 | — | $138.00 | $17.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | — | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.24 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +2.8% |
USLM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RDNT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RDNT vs SMID vs USLM vs ARLO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) is the stronger pick with 31.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 6% for Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO). United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO?
On trailing P/E, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus Arlo Technologies, Inc. at 106. 4x. On forward P/E, Arlo Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO?
Over the past 5 years, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) delivered a total return of +286. 0%, compared to +123. 1% for Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMID returned +1437% versus ARLO's -32. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus Smith-Midland Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning SMID is approximately 20% more volatile than USLM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (USLM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 137% for RadNet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) is pulling ahead at 31.
8% versus 3. 6% for Arlo Technologies, Inc. (ARLO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Smith-Midland Corporation grew EPS 866. 7% year-over-year, compared to -768. 4% for RadNet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, USLM leads at 16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO?
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
(USLM) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 0% net margin versus 2. 3% for RadNet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: USLM leads at 42. 4% versus 1. 1% for ARLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — USLM leads at 48. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Arlo Technologies, Inc.
(ARLO) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 91. 8x for RadNet, Inc. — 73. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RDNT: 60. 0% to $92. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO?
In this comparison, USLM (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RDNT, SMID, ARLO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RDNT or SMID or USLM or ARLO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Smith-Midland Corporation (SMID) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1437% 10Y return).
Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMID: +1437%, ARLO: -32. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RDNT and SMID and USLM and ARLO?
These companies operate in different sectors (RDNT (Healthcare) and SMID (Basic Materials) and USLM (Basic Materials) and ARLO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RDNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMID is a small-cap high-growth stock; USLM is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARLO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.