Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $183M | $26.21B | $11.79B | $4.00B | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $213M | $6.00B | $453M | $446M | $359M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $806K | $906M | $119M | $17M | $58M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 35.5% | 57.3% | 53.9% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 20.8% | 18.1% | 4.6% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 58.3x | 25.0x | 94.3x | 55.5x | 17.8x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.61B | $13M | $0.00 | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $483M | $403M | $59M | $108M |
RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson Electron… (RELL) | 100 | 353.8 | +253.8% |
| Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) | 100 | 402.8 | +302.8% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 428.6 | +328.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Ituran Location and… (ITRN) | 100 | 344.5 | +244.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RELL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
HUBB lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 27.0% 10Y total return vs HUBB's 410.7%
- 13.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8%
- 26.2% margin vs RELL's 0.4%
Among these 5 stocks, POWI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ITRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 2.1%, current ratio 2.28x
- PEG 0.58 vs VICR's 2.10
- Beta 1.18, yield 3.2%, current ratio 2.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs HUBB's 3.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.8x vs 55.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs RELL's 0.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs VICR's 2.79 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.4% vs HUBB's +41.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs RELL's 0.4%, ROIC 8.9% vs -1.4% |
RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories
VICR leads 2 • RELL leads 0 • HUBB leads 0 • POWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBB is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.0B annually — 28.2x RELL's $213M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RELL's 0.4%. On growth, ITRN holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $213M | $6.0B | $453M | $446M | $359M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $1.5B | $103M | $41M | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $806,000 | $906M | $119M | $17M | $58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $909M | $119M | $85M | $71M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +35.5% | +57.3% | +53.9% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +20.8% | +18.1% | +4.6% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +15.1% | +26.2% | +3.7% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +15.2% | +26.3% | +18.9% | +19.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +11.1% | +11.5% | +2.6% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.2% | +8.3% | +3.4% | -60.0% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ITRN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, ITRN trades at a 89% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ITRN offers better value at 0.66x vs VICR's 2.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183M | $26.2B | $11.8B | $4.0B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $149M | $28.3B | $11.4B | $3.9B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -159.96x | 29.81x | 100.13x | 184.18x | 20.19x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.27x | 25.01x | 94.31x | 55.51x | 17.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.43x | 2.23x | — | 0.66x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 96.90x | 20.81x | 197.81x | 79.69x | 13.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 4.48x | 28.91x | 9.02x | 3.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 6.85x | 16.50x | 6.01x | 5.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.61x | 29.97x | 98.86x | 45.93x | 20.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITRN delivers a 27.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $1 for RELL. RELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HUBB's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUBB scores 7/9 vs POWI's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | +24.4% | +18.7% | +2.4% | +27.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +11.6% | +16.6% | +2.1% | +15.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.4% | +17.1% | +8.9% | +2.4% | +47.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +20.1% | +5.7% | +2.9% | +29.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.68x | 0.02x | — | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$34M | $2.1B | -$390M | -$59M | -$103M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $483M | $403M | $59M | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.6B | $13M | $0 | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 16.90x | — | — | 32.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VICR five years ago would be worth $30,126 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +535.7% total return vs HUBB's +41.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 82.5% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +38.7% | +6.8% | +123.6% | +93.2% | +42.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.8% | +41.5% | +535.7% | +44.4% | +76.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.1% | +87.9% | +507.9% | -6.3% | +206.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +114.2% | +159.4% | +201.3% | -8.3% | +180.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.9% | +410.7% | +2704.1% | +232.7% | +233.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.0% | +23.4% | +82.5% | -2.2% | +45.2% |
Risk & Volatility
ITRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITRN is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ITRN currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs HUBB's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 1.38x | 2.79x | 2.08x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.34 | $565.50 | $293.95 | $78.94 | $59.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $349.40 | $40.27 | $30.86 | $32.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.9% | +87.2% | +88.9% | +91.0% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 41.2 | 68.2 | 76.1 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 109K | 546K | 864K | 967K | 118K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — POWI and ITRN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RELL as "Hold", HUBB as "Hold", VICR as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", ITRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -6.3% for VICR (target: $245). For income investors, ITRN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.21% vs HUBB's 1.09%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $535.14 | $245.00 | $79.00 | $56.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 17 | 7 | 16 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.1% | — | +1.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 0 | 18 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $5.35 | — | $0.84 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.9% | +0.3% | +2.5% | +0.2% |
ITRN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). VICR leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). 1 tied.
RELL vs HUBB vs VICR vs POWI vs ITRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the stronger pick with 13.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vicor Corporation (VICR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN?
On trailing P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. is actually cheaper at 17. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Ituran Location and Control Ltd. wins at 0. 58x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN?
Over the past 5 years, Vicor Corporation (VICR) delivered a total return of +201.
3%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +27. 0% versus RELL's +228. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 79β — meaning VICR is approximately 138% more volatile than ITRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Richardson Electronics, Ltd. (RELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 68% for Hubbell Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vicor Corporation (VICR) is pulling ahead at 13.
5% versus 3. 8% for Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ITRN leads at 7. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -0. 5% for Richardson Electronics, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITRN leads at 21. 4% versus -1. 2% for RELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 58x versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Ituran Location and Control Ltd. (ITRN) trades at 17. 8x forward P/E versus 94. 3x for Vicor Corporation — 76. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN?
In this comparison, ITRN (3.
2% yield), RELL (1. 9% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield), HUBB (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. VICR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RELL or HUBB or VICR or POWI or ITRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ituran Location and Control Ltd.
(ITRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), 3. 2% yield, +233. 6% 10Y return). Vicor Corporation (VICR) carries a higher beta of 2. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITRN: +233. 6%, VICR: +27. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RELL and HUBB and VICR and POWI and ITRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RELL (Technology) and HUBB (Industrials) and VICR (Technology) and POWI (Technology) and ITRN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RELL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ITRN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. RELL, HUBB, POWI, ITRN pay a dividend while VICR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.