Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $189M | $11.57B | $4.08B | $78.63B | $7.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $213M | $453M | $446M | $2.79B | $785M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $806K | $119M | $17M | $616M | $-65M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 57.3% | 53.9% | 55.2% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 18.1% | 4.6% | 26.1% | -9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 60.3x | 92.5x | 58.7x | 67.2x | 80.3x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $13M | $0.00 | $24M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $403M | $59M | $1.10B | $364M |
RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson Electron… (RELL) | 100 | 366.2 | +266.2% |
| Vicor Corporation (VICR) | 100 | 420.6 | +320.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 763.2 | +663.2% |
| Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB) | 100 | 232.2 | +132.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RELL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 2.03, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.03, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 4.51x
- 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
VICR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.7%
- 26.5% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 25.3%
- PEG 2.07 vs MPWR's 2.28
- Better valuation composite
POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.11, yield 1.1%, current ratio 6.51x
Among these 5 stocks, MPWR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SLAB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and stability is your priority.
- 34.3% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
- Beta 1.20 vs VICR's 2.87
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.3% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.2% margin vs SLAB's -8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.20 vs VICR's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs POWI's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs POWI's +43.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.6% ROA vs SLAB's -5.1%, ROIC 8.9% vs -6.9% |
RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories
RELL leads 1 • MPWR leads 1 • SLAB leads 1 • POWI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VICR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 13.1x RELL's $213M. VICR is the more profitable business, keeping 26.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLAB's -8.3%. On growth, SLAB holds the edge at +25.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $213M | $453M | $446M | $2.8B | $785M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $103M | $41M | $781M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $806,000 | $119M | $17M | $616M | -$65M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $119M | $85M | $664M | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +57.3% | +53.9% | +55.2% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +18.1% | +4.6% | +26.1% | -9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +26.2% | +3.7% | +22.1% | -8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +26.3% | +18.9% | +23.8% | +8.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.7% | +11.5% | +2.6% | +20.8% | +25.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.2% | +3.4% | -60.0% | -88.4% | +88.8% |
Valuation Metrics
RELL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 98.3x trailing earnings, VICR trades at a 48% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VICR offers better value at 2.19x vs MPWR's 4.26x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $189M | $11.6B | $4.1B | $78.6B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $156M | $11.2B | $4.0B | $77.6B | $6.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -165.55x | 98.26x | 187.90x | 125.56x | -109.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 60.31x | 92.55x | 58.74x | 67.24x | 80.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.19x | — | 4.26x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 101.05x | 194.00x | 81.32x | 99.47x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.91x | 28.37x | 9.20x | 28.18x | 9.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 16.19x | 6.13x | 21.90x | 6.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.43x | 97.02x | 46.85x | 118.03x | 108.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
VICR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-6 for SLAB. MPWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VICR's 0.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VICR scores 7/9 vs SLAB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | +18.7% | +2.4% | +17.9% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +16.6% | +2.1% | +15.2% | -5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.4% | +8.9% | +2.4% | +22.2% | -6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.5% | +5.7% | +2.9% | +20.4% | -6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.02x | — | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$34M | -$390M | -$59M | -$1.1B | -$364M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $403M | $59M | $1.1B | $364M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $13M | $0 | $24M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | — | -58.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VICR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MPWR five years ago would be worth $50,422 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, VICR leads with a +524.2% total return vs POWI's +43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VICR at 81.4% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.1% | +119.5% | +97.0% | +71.2% | +64.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.6% | +524.2% | +43.3% | +151.2% | +95.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.9% | +496.6% | -4.5% | +286.3% | +58.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.9% | +218.0% | -1.3% | +404.2% | +70.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +240.0% | +2651.8% | +239.0% | +2534.9% | +374.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.3% | +81.4% | -1.5% | +56.9% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VICR's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs VICR's 87.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 2.87x | 2.11x | 2.27x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.55 | $293.95 | $81.59 | $1662.00 | $218.66 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.66 | $40.54 | $30.86 | $630.00 | $109.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +87.2% | +89.8% | +96.3% | +99.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 59.9 | 61.3 | 61.6 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 860K | 982K | 578K | 457K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RELL and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RELL as "Hold", VICR as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -9.0% for RELL (target: $14). For income investors, RELL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.80% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $245.00 | $79.00 | $1615.00 | $211.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 | 16 | 25 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | +1.1% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 18 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | $0.84 | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.4% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
VICR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). RELL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RELL vs VICR vs POWI vs MPWR vs SLAB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger pick with 34. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Vicor Corporation (VICR) offers the better valuation at 98. 3x trailing P/E (92. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vicor Corporation (VICR) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB?
On trailing P/E, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the cheapest at 98.
3x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Power Integrations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 58. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Vicor Corporation wins at 2. 07x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB?
Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) delivered a total return of +404. 2%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VICR returned +26. 5% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Vicor Corporation's 2. 87β — meaning VICR is approximately 139% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Vicor Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is pulling ahead at 34. 3% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vicor Corporation grew EPS 1764% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB?
Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more profitable company, earning 29.
1% net margin versus -8. 3% for Silicon Laboratories Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -9. 0% for SLAB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLAB leads at 58. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Vicor Corporation (VICR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 07x versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) trades at 58. 7x forward P/E versus 92. 5x for Vicor Corporation — 33. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB?
In this comparison, RELL (1.
8% yield), POWI (1. 1% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. VICR, SLAB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RELL or VICR or POWI or MPWR or SLAB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Silicon Laboratories Inc.
(SLAB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), +374. 6% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLAB: +374. 6%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RELL and VICR and POWI and MPWR and SLAB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RELL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VICR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock. RELL, POWI pay a dividend while VICR, MPWR, SLAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.