REVG vs LCII

For growth investors, LCI Industries (LCII) is the stronger pick with 10.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 5% for REV Group, Inc. (REVG). LCI Industries (LCII) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate REV Group, Inc. (REVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, LCI Industries (LCII) is the cheapest at 15.

4x versus REV Group, Inc. at 33. 8x. On forward P/E, LCI Industries is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, REV Group, Inc.

(REVG) delivered a total return of +271. 2%, compared to -5. 3% for LCI Industries (LCII). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REVG returned +174. 2% versus LCII's +131. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LCI Industries (LCII) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

99β versus REV Group, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning REVG is approximately 50% more volatile than LCII relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, REV Group, Inc. (REVG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 91% for LCI Industries — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LCI Industries (LCII) is pulling ahead at 10.

2% versus 3. 5% for REV Group, Inc. (REVG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LCI Industries grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -60. 0% for REV Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REVG leads at 1. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

LCI Industries (LCII) is the more profitable company, earning 4.

6% net margin versus 3. 9% for REV Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REVG leads at 7. 8% versus 6. 8% for LCII. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCII leads at 23. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, LCI Industries (LCII) trades at 13.

4x forward P/E versus 17. 2x for REV Group, Inc. — 3. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LCII: 28. 8% to $150. 60.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

LCI Industries (LCII) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 0. 4% for REV Group, Inc. (REVG).

For long-horizon retirement investors, LCI Industries (LCII) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

99), 3. 9% yield, +131. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LCII: +131. 1%, REVG: +174. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (REVG (Industrials) and LCII (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: REVG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LCII is a small-cap deep-value stock. LCII pays a dividend while REVG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.