REZI vs CARR

For growth investors, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) offers the better valuation at 39. 9x trailing P/E (24. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 13. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) delivered a total return of +62.

2%, compared to +37. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CARR returned +500. 2% versus REZI's +41. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

19β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning REZI is approximately 90% more volatile than CARR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 90% versus 109% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -3. 3% for Carrier Global Corporation (CARR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Carrier Global Corporation grew EPS -72. 4% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CARR leads at 7. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

9% net margin versus -7. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CARR leads at 9. 9% versus 8. 1% for REZI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — REZI leads at 29. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Carrier Global Corporation — 11. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CARR: -0. 6% to $67. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) offers the highest yield at 1. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Carrier Global Corporation (CARR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

19), 1. 3% yield, +500. 2% 10Y return). Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CARR: +500. 2%, REZI: +41. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.