REZI vs GNRC

For growth investors, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) offers the better valuation at 99. 2x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On forward P/E, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 13. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) delivered a total return of +33. 0%, compared to -18. 5% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GNRC returned +666. 1% versus REZI's +38. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Generac Holdings Inc.

(GNRC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 27β — meaning REZI is approximately 34% more volatile than GNRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 109% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -2. 0% for Generac Holdings Inc. (GNRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Generac Holdings Inc. grew EPS -50. 1% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, REZI leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Generac Holdings Inc.

(GNRC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 8% net margin versus -7. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REZI leads at 8. 1% versus 6. 9% for GNRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GNRC leads at 38. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Resideo Technologies, Inc.

(REZI) trades at 13. 1x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Generac Holdings Inc. — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GNRC: 1. 7% to $271. 22.

In this comparison, REZI (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. GNRC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Generac Holdings Inc.

(GNRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+666. 1% 10Y return). Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GNRC: +666. 1%, REZI: +38. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

REZI pays a dividend while GNRC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.