RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$161M
5Y Perf.+168.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
RFIL vs MTSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$25.84B
5Y Perf.+984.9%
RFIL vs MTSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | RFIL | MTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $161M | $25.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $1.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $270K | $177M |
| Gross Margin | 32.0% | 55.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 16.0% |
| Forward P/E | 25.7x | 76.9x |
| Total Debt | $27M | $538M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $112M |
RFIL vs MTSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
RFIL
MTSI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 268.5 | +168.5% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RFIL vs MTSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MTSI leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. RF Industries, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
RFIL
RF Industries, Ltd.
The Income Pick
RFIL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.01
- Lower P/E (25.7x vs 76.9x)
- +275.6% vs MTSI's +203.8%
Best for: income & stability
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play
MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 32.6%, EPS growth -170.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.7%
- 8.0% 10Y total return vs RFIL's 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 40.5%, current ratio 3.71x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MTSI | 32.6% revenue growth vs RFIL's 24.3% |
| Value | RFIL | Lower P/E (25.7x vs 76.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | MTSI | 16.5% margin vs RFIL's 0.3% |
| Stability / Safety | MTSI | Beta 1.75 vs RFIL's 2.01, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | RFIL | +275.6% vs MTSI's +203.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MTSI | 8.6% ROA vs RFIL's 0.4%, ROIC 6.0% vs 3.6% |
RFIL vs MTSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2019
Segment breakdown not available.
RFIL vs MTSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMTSILAGGINGRFIL
RFILRF Industries, Ltd.
1leads
MTSIMACOM Technology Solu…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs RFILMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MTSI5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
RFIL5/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MTSI5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MTSI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MTSI2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 13.4x RFIL's $80M. MTSI is the more profitable business, keeping 16.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RFIL's 0.3%. On growth, MTSI holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $210M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $270,000 | $177M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $168M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.0% | +55.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +16.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +16.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +42.9% |
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
RFIL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RFIL's 34.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 136.1x.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $183M | $26.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2130.00x | -471.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.71x | 76.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 34.63x | 136.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 26.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.56x | 19.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 37.12x | 134.01x |
RFIL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for RFIL. MTSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.41x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RFIL's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs MTSI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.8% | +13.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.2% | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.76x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $426M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $538M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 391.47x |
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $61,359 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,081 for RFIL. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +275.6% total return vs MTSI's +203.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 84.4% vs RFIL's 55.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +162.5% | +96.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +275.6% | +203.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +274.6% | +526.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.8% | +513.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +545.3% | +795.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +55.3% | +84.4% |
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RFIL's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 1.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.45 | $355.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.82 | $110.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.7 | 71.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 250K | 1.1M |
MTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RFIL as "Buy" and MTSI as "Buy".
| Metric | RFILRF Industries, Lt… | MTSIMACOM Technology … |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $254.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
MTSI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RFIL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Best OverallMACOM Technology Solutions … (MTSI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
RFIL vs MTSI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RFIL or MTSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 3% for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL). RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) offers the better valuation at 2130. 0x trailing P/E (25. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RFIL or MTSI?
On forward P/E, RF Industries, Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 25. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RFIL or MTSI?
Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) delivered a total return of +513. 6%, compared to +130. 8% for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +795. 9% versus RFIL's +545. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RFIL or MTSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 75β versus RF Industries, Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning RFIL is approximately 15% more volatile than MTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 41% versus 76% for RF Industries, Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RFIL or MTSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus 24. 3% for RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RFIL or MTSI?
RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -5. 6% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTSI leads at 13. 4% versus 3. 5% for RFIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RFIL or MTSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) trades at 25. 7x forward P/E versus 76. 9x for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — 51. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — RFIL or MTSI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is RFIL or MTSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+795. 9% 10Y return). RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTSI: +795. 9%, RFIL: +545. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RFIL and MTSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (RFIL (Industrials) and MTSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(RFIL: -1.2% · MTSI: 22.5%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.