Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RHI vs TBI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
RHI vs TBI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $2.77B | $182M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.38B | $1.25B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $-53M |
| Gross Margin | 36.8% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 1.4% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $421M | $171M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $25M |
RHI vs TBI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Half Interna… (RHI) | 100 | 54.0 | -46.0% |
| TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) | 100 | 38.9 | -61.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RHI vs TBI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RHI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 8.7%
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs TBI's -68.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 33.0%, current ratio 1.52x
TBI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.1%, EPS growth 61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.5%
- 3.1% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2%
- +51.0% vs RHI's -31.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.1% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs TBI's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs TBI's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield; 22-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.0% vs RHI's -31.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs TBI's -8.1%, ROIC 4.6% vs -5.2% |
RHI vs TBI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RHI vs TBI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RHI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RHI is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 4.3x TBI's $1.2B. RHI is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TBI's -4.3%. On growth, RHI holds the edge at -5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | -$53M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $267M | -$60M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.8% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | -4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.8% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.6% | -37.5% |
Valuation Metrics
TBI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, RHI's 21.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TBI's 160.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $182M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $329M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.60x | -3.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.57x | 160.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 0.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.15x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.39x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RHI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RHI delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-19 for TBI. RHI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TBI's 0.62x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.3% | -18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | -8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | -5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.33x | 0.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$43M | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $421M | $171M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -46.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RHI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RHI five years ago would be worth $4,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,130 for TBI. Over the past 12 months, TBI leads with a +51.0% total return vs RHI's -31.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RHI at -20.4% vs TBI's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.4% | +36.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -31.4% | +51.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.5% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -58.8% | -78.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.2% | -68.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.4% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RHI and TBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RHI is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TBI's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TBI currently trades 77.2% from its 52-week high vs RHI's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.54 | $7.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.84 | $3.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.4% | +77.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 83.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 386K |
Analyst Outlook
RHI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RHI as "Hold" and TBI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.4% upside for RHI (target: $41) vs -4.3% for TBI (target: $6). RHI is the only dividend payer here at 8.67% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.67 | $5.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 22 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.37 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +0.6% |
RHI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TBI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RHI vs TBI: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RHI or TBI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is the stronger pick with 3. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the better valuation at 20. 6x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — RHI or TBI?
Over the past 5 years, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) delivered a total return of -58. 8%, compared to -78. 7% for TrueBlue, Inc. (TBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHI returned +10. 2% versus TBI's -68. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — RHI or TBI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus TrueBlue, Inc. 's 1. 13β — meaning TBI is approximately 15% more volatile than RHI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 33% versus 62% for TrueBlue, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — RHI or TBI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TrueBlue, Inc.
(TBI) is pulling ahead at 3. 1% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TrueBlue, Inc. grew EPS 61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -45. 5% for Robert Half International Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RHI leads at -9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — RHI or TBI?
Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 5% net margin versus -3. 0% for TrueBlue, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RHI leads at 1. 4% versus -1. 7% for TBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RHI leads at 37. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is RHI or TBI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RHI: 48.
4% to $40. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — RHI or TBI?
In this comparison, RHI (8.
7% yield) pays a dividend. TBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is RHI or TBI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Robert Half International Inc.
(RHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 8. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RHI: +10. 2%, TBI: -68. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RHI and TBI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. RHI pays a dividend while TBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.