Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RHLD vs CSWC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
RHLD vs CSWC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $1.19B | $1.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $445M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $141M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 55.5% | 66.5% |
| Operating Margin | 32.6% | 48.5% |
| Forward P/E | 42.6x | 10.1x |
| Total Debt | $202M | $956M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98K | $43M |
RHLD vs CSWC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resolute Holdings M… (RHLD) | 100 | 298.3 | +198.3% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 103.9 | +3.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RHLD vs CSWC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RHLD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 289.1% 10Y total return vs CSWC's 231.6%
- +414.9% vs CSWC's +33.7%
- 71.8% ROA vs CSWC's 4.8%
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.1%
- Rev growth 7.7%, EPS growth -28.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.7% NII/revenue growth vs RHLD's 7.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 42.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.1% margin vs RHLD's 31.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs RHLD's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | 10.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs RHLD's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +414.9% vs CSWC's +33.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 71.8% ROA vs CSWC's 4.8% |
RHLD vs CSWC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSWC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RHLD is the larger business by revenue, generating $445M annually — 2.7x CSWC's $164M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RHLD's 31.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $445M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $154M | $142M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $141M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $175M | -$69M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.5% | +66.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +48.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +43.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | -132.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.9% | +113.3% |
Valuation Metrics
RHLD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.5x trailing earnings, CSWC trades at a 61% valuation discount to RHLD's 42.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RHLD's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 42.58x | 16.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.25x | 27.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.83x | 8.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.29x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RHLD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RHLD scores 6/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +71.8% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $202M | $913M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98,000 | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $202M | $956M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.95x | 2.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RHLD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RHLD five years ago would be worth $38,911 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,214 for CSWC. Over the past 12 months, RHLD leads with a +414.9% total return vs CSWC's +33.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RHLD at 57.3% vs CSWC's 20.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +414.9% | +33.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +289.1% | +76.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +289.1% | +52.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +289.1% | +231.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.3% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSWC is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RHLD's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs RHLD's 59.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $236.19 | $24.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.55 | $19.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +59.1% | +99.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 66.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 215K | 666K |
Analyst Outlook
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.12% vs RHLD's 1.31%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.3% | +10.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.84 | $2.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CSWC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). RHLD leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
RHLD vs CSWC: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RHLD or CSWC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger pick with 7.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 7% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD). Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RHLD or CSWC?
On trailing P/E, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the cheapest at 16.
5x versus Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. at 42. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RHLD or CSWC?
Over the past 5 years, Resolute Holdings Management, Inc.
(RHLD) delivered a total return of +289. 1%, compared to +52. 1% for Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RHLD returned +289. 1% versus CSWC's +231. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RHLD or CSWC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning RHLD is approximately 126% more volatile than CSWC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — RHLD or CSWC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is pulling ahead at 7.
7% versus 7. 7% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. grew EPS 963. 2% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Capital Southwest Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RHLD or CSWC?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus 26. 2% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CSWC leads at 48. 5% versus 30. 1% for RHLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSWC leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — RHLD or CSWC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) offers the highest yield at 10. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD).
08Is RHLD or CSWC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 10. 1% yield, +231. 6% 10Y return). Resolute Holdings Management, Inc. (RHLD) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSWC: +231. 6%, RHLD: +289. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between RHLD and CSWC?
These companies operate in different sectors (RHLD (Industrials) and CSWC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RHLD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.