Restaurants
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Restaurants
Restaurants
RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Entertainment | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $216M | $416M | $11.68B | $322M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $282M | $2.09B | $6.06B | $457M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-65M | $415M | $10M |
| Gross Margin | 55.2% | 66.8% | 14.0% | 43.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.3% | 4.3% | 8.3% | 8.4% |
| Forward P/E | 4.6x | 94.6x | 27.7x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $266M | $3.17B | $1.89B | $408M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $34M | $17M | $135M | $2M |
RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RCI Hospitality Hol… (RICK) | 100 | 204.0 | +104.0% |
| Dave & Buster's Ent… (PLAY) | 100 | 89.6 | -10.4% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 338.1 | +238.1% |
| Denny's Corporation (DENN) | 100 | 61.6 | -38.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RICK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 15.0x)
PLAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TXRH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 322.4% 10Y total return vs RICK's 188.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, current ratio 0.50x
DENN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +47.1% vs PLAY's -62.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs RICK's -5.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.8% margin vs PLAY's -3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs PLAY's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs RICK's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.1% vs PLAY's -62.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs PLAY's -1.6%, ROIC 14.5% vs 2.4% |
RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TXRH leads in 4 of 6 categories
RICK leads 1 • PLAY leads 0 • DENN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 21.5x RICK's $282M. TXRH is the more profitable business, keeping 6.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLAY's -3.1%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $282M | $2.1B | $6.1B | $457M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | $377M | $716M | $55M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$65M | $415M | $10M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $39M | -$33M | $361M | $2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.2% | +66.8% | +14.0% | +43.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.3% | +4.3% | +8.3% | +8.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | -3.1% | +6.8% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | -1.6% | +5.9% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | -1.5% | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -111.1% | -74.2% | +10.0% | -89.9% |
Valuation Metrics
RICK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.2x trailing earnings, DENN trades at a 48% valuation discount to TXRH's 29.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RICK's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TXRH's 18.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $416M | $11.7B | $322M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $3.6B | $13.4B | $728M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.98x | -8.54x | 29.14x | 15.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.63x | 94.62x | 27.67x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.75x | 9.27x | 18.94x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 0.20x | 1.99x | 0.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 4.54x | 7.98x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.19x | — | 34.16x | 350.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TXRH delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-53 for PLAY. RICK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLAY's 34.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DENN scores 7/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -53.1% | +27.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | -1.6% | +12.2% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.5% | +2.4% | +14.5% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +2.9% | +20.1% | +11.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 34.71x | 1.27x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $233M | $3.1B | $1.8B | $406M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $34M | $17M | $135M | $2M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $266M | $3.2B | $1.9B | $408M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 0.46x | — | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TXRH five years ago would be worth $20,912 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,012 for PLAY. Over the past 12 months, DENN leads with a +47.1% total return vs PLAY's -62.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 19.7% vs PLAY's -34.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | -29.9% | +4.6% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.7% | -62.7% | -6.4% | +47.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.3% | -71.6% | +71.7% | -48.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.5% | -69.9% | +109.1% | -62.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +188.5% | -73.0% | +322.4% | -43.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -27.7% | -34.3% | +19.7% | -19.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TXRH and DENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TXRH is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLAY's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DENN currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs PLAY's 33.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.80x | 0.42x | 0.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $41.37 | $35.53 | $197.00 | $6.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.76 | $9.65 | $153.82 | $3.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.3% | +33.6% | +90.2% | +99.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.2 | 44.2 | 54.5 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 1.8M | 1.1M | 0 |
Analyst Outlook
TXRH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RICK as "Buy", PLAY as "Buy", TXRH as "Hold", DENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 246.7% upside for RICK (target: $98) vs 7.7% for TXRH (target: $191). For income investors, TXRH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.52% vs RICK's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $98.00 | $17.33 | $191.46 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 20 | 44 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | — | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | — | $2.71 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.5% | +0.4% | +1.3% | +3.6% |
TXRH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RICK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
RICK vs PLAY vs TXRH vs DENN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). Denny's Corporation (DENN) offers the better valuation at 15. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN?
On trailing P/E, Denny's Corporation (DENN) is the cheapest at 15.
2x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN?
Over the past 5 years, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) delivered a total return of +109. 1%, compared to -69. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +322. 4% versus PLAY's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning PLAY is approximately 325% more volatile than TXRH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 35% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus -5. 5% for RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. (RICK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 272. 7% year-over-year, compared to -195. 9% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN?
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 9% net margin versus -2. 3% for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RICK leads at 13. 0% versus 5. 0% for PLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLAY leads at 85. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
(RICK) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 94. 6x for Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. — 90. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RICK: 246. 7% to $98. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN?
In this comparison, TXRH (1.
5% yield), RICK (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PLAY, DENN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RICK or PLAY or TXRH or DENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 5% yield, +322. 4% 10Y return). Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXRH: +322. 4%, PLAY: -73. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RICK and PLAY and TXRH and DENN?
These companies operate in different sectors (RICK (Consumer Cyclical) and PLAY (Communication Services) and TXRH (Consumer Cyclical) and DENN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: RICK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DENN is a small-cap deep-value stock. RICK, TXRH pay a dividend while PLAY, DENN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.