RIME vs WRAP

For growth investors, Wrap Technologies, Inc.

(WRAP) is the stronger pick with 15. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 7% for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME). The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Wrap Technologies, Inc.

(WRAP) delivered a total return of -76. 1%, compared to -100. 0% for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WRAP returned -71. 2% versus RIME's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wrap Technologies, Inc.

(WRAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 94β versus Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 38β — meaning RIME is approximately 23% more volatile than WRAP relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wrap Technologies, Inc.

(WRAP) is pulling ahead at 15. 4% versus -39. 7% for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wrap Technologies, Inc. grew EPS -37. 5% year-over-year, compared to -46. 1% for Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WRAP leads at -13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Algorhythm Holdings, Inc.

(RIME) is the more profitable company, earning -99. 0% net margin versus -198. 6% for Wrap Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps -99. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RIME leads at -59. 3% versus -259. 2% for WRAP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WRAP leads at 51. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, WRAP (1.

5% yield) pays a dividend. RIME does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Wrap Technologies, Inc.

(WRAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 5% yield). Algorhythm Holdings, Inc. (RIME) carries a higher beta of 2. 38 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WRAP: -71. 2%, RIME: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: RIME is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WRAP is a small-cap high-growth stock. WRAP pays a dividend while RIME does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.